Skip to the content
Browse the library

Buchwald–Hartwig amination: Ethyl 6-bromo-4-[(2,4-dichlorophenyl)amino]-7-methoxyquinoline-3-carboxylate → Ethyl 4-[(2,4-dichlorophenyl)amino]-7-methoxy-6-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)quinoline-3-carboxylate

0% yield, run at 100 °C, as recorded by experimental reaction archive. The written procedure is below.

verified record, 0% yield recorded, Not balanced as written, From experimental reaction archive

Reagents, catalysts and solvents are in the table below.

The atoms, from reactants to products

CCOCOCCNCCCOCCNCCNCCCCCCNCCCCClCCClBr
Reactants · 1/6
breakingformingbond order changesmapped atom that changes

Drawn from the record's atom map: which bonds break and which form between the reactants and products the source listed. It shows a change in connectivity, not a simulated trajectory and not a mechanism.

What was in the flask

RoleSpeciesFormulaYield
ReactantEthyl 6-bromo-4-[(2,4-dichlorophenyl)amino]-7-methoxyquinoline-3-carboxylateC₁₉H₁₅BrCl₂N₂O₃—
Reactant1-MethylpiperazineC₅H₁₂N₂—
ReagentCesium carbonateCCs₂O₃—
CatalystBinap, (A+-)-C₄₄H₃₂P₂—
CatalystBis(dibenzylideneacetone)palladiumC₅₁H₄₂O₃Pd₂—
Solvent1,4-DioxaneC₄H₈O₂—
ProductEthyl 4-[(2,4-dichlorophenyl)amino]-7-methoxy-6-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)quinoline-3-carboxylateC₂₄H₂₆Cl₂N₄O₃0%

The equation does not balance as written. That is usual for an experimental record: the source listed what it put in and what it measured, not a stoichiometric equation.

Conditions

Temperature
100 °C

Only the dimensions the source stated are listed. Anything absent here was not recorded, and it is not inferred from what the class usually needs.

Yield

  • 0% of Ethyl 4-[(2,4-dichlorophenyl)amino]-7-methoxy-6-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)quinoline-3-carboxylate.

Procedure

Copied from the source record, unedited

To a solution of ethyl 6-bromo-4-(2,4-dichlorophenylamino)-7-methoxyquinoline-3-carboxylate (694 mg, 1.48 mmol) and 1-methylpiperazine (0.246 mL, 2.21 mmol) in dioxane (10 mL) was added cesium carbonate (962 mg, 2.95 mmol), tris(dibenzylideneacetone)dipalladium(0) (67.6 mg, 0.07 mmol) and rac-2,2'-Bis(diphenylphosphino)-1,1'-binaphthyl (92 mg, 0.15 mmol). Reaction vessel in oil bath set to 100 °C. 2.15pm o/n 20 hours - LCMS shows product (489) and SM (470) 26 hours - ratio of product : SM looks better by MS. 2 x o/n - small SM peak remaining in MS. Concentrated onto silica and purified on ISCO. 40g column, 4:1 H:EA, then gradient up to ~1:1 EA:MeOH. Can't find product by LCMS in any fractions. NMR of polar fractions may be acid from Buchwald coupling. Need to purify SM on column, rep

The source

This record comes from experimental reaction archive (ord-805e4c9d19604f5ca8a6f376906a62c5). Open the source and check it against what is on this page.

  • experimental reaction archive record ord-805e4c9d19604f5ca8a6f376906a62c5 from dataset "750 AstraZeneca ELN dataset" (url: https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article-details/60c9e3f37792a23bfdb2d471). No atom mapping is provided by the source.

    experimental record · quality medium · source

experimental reaction record.

How to read this record

This is one experiment, not a rule. It says that on one occasion these species were combined under these conditions and this came out. It does not say the reaction will give the same result on your substrate, and nothing on the page has been generalised into a claim that it would.

The pathway is a separate question, kept on separate pages. A mechanism here is the canonical arrow pushing for a class, run on real structures and labelled rule-derived. It is not evidence, and this record is not a mechanism.