Buchwald–Hartwig amination, record ord-d491779c6ebc428d97eb810ae5444bf6
One recorded run of this reaction. Below is what the source recorded, and nothing added to it.
What was in the flask
| Role | Species | Formula | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reactant | Ethyl 7-bromobenzofuran-2-carboxylate | C₁₁H₉BrO₃ | |
| Reactant | Piperazine, 2-pyridylethyl- | C₁₁H₁₇N₃ | |
| Reagent | Cesium carbonate | CCs₂O₃ | |
| Catalyst | 2-Dicyclohexylphosphino-2',4',6'-triisoprophylbiphenyl | C₃₃H₄₉P | |
| Catalyst | Bis(dibenzylideneacetone)palladium | C₅₁H₄₂O₃Pd₂ | |
| Solvent | 1,4-Dioxane | C₄H₈O₂ | |
| Product | Ethyl 7-(4-(2-(pyridin-2-yl)ethyl)piperazin-1-yl)benzofuran-2-carboxylate | C₂₂H₂₅N₃O₃ | 18.97% |
Conditions
- Temperature
- 95 °C
Yield
- 19% of Ethyl 7-(4-(2-(pyridin-2-yl)ethyl)piperazin-1-yl)benzofuran-2-carboxylate.
Procedure
Copied from the source record, unedited
The reaction mixture of ethyl 7-bromobenzofuran-2-carboxylate (2.0 g, 7.43 mmol), 1-(2-(pyridin-2-yl)ethyl)piperazine (1.564 g, 8.18 mmol), Tris(dibenzylideneacetone)dipalladium(0) (0.476 g, 0.52 mmol), 2-Dicyclohexylphosphino-2',4',6'-tri-iso-propyl-1,1'-biphenyl (0.496 g, 1.04 mmol) and Cesium carbonate (3.63 g, 11.15 mmol) in dioxane (30 mL) (degassed with argon for 10 min) was heated at 95 °C under argon for 5 h. After cooling, the reaction mixture was filtered and concentrated. The product was purified twice by isco, the first using DCM:MeOH (0-5%) and the second time using DCM:MeOH (0-3%).
The source
This record comes from experimental reaction archive (ord-d491779c6ebc428d97eb810ae5444bf6). Open the source and check it against what is on this page.
experimental reaction archive record ord-d491779c6ebc428d97eb810ae5444bf6 from dataset "750 AstraZeneca ELN dataset" (url: https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article-details/60c9e3f37792a23bfdb2d471). No atom mapping is provided by the source.
How to read this record
This is one experiment, not a rule. It says that on one occasion these species were combined under these conditions and this came out. It does not say the reaction will give the same result on your substrate, and nothing on the page has been generalised into a claim that it would.
The pathway is a separate question, kept on separate pages. A mechanism here is the canonical arrow pushing for a class, run on real structures and labelled rule-derived. It is not evidence, and this record is not a mechanism.