Skip to the content
Browse the library

Buchwald–Hartwig amination: N-(1,3-dimethylpyrazol-5-yl)-4-iodo-5-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-2-amine → 2-(2-(1,3-dimethyl-1H-pyrazol-5-ylamino)-5-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-4-ylamino)-6-methoxy-N-methylbenzamide

42% yield, run at 95 °C, as recorded by experimental reaction archive. The written procedure is below. One of 2 recorded runs making this product; all of them are compared below.

verified record, 42% yield recorded, Not balanced as written, From experimental reaction archive

Reagents, catalysts and solvents are in the table below.

The atoms, from reactants to products

CNCOCCNCCCNCCCCNNCNCCCFFFCCCCOCI
Reactants · 1/6
breakingformingbond order changesmapped atom that changes

Drawn from the record's atom map: which bonds break and which form between the reactants and products the source listed. It shows a change in connectivity, not a simulated trajectory and not a mechanism.

What was in the flask

RoleSpeciesFormulaYield
ReactantN-(1,3-dimethylpyrazol-5-yl)-4-iodo-5-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-2-amineC₁₁H₁₀F₃IN₄—
Reactant2-amino-6-methoxy-N-methylbenzamideC₉H₁₂N₂O₂—
ReagentCesium carbonateCCs₂O₃—
Catalyst1,1'-(9,9-Dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(1,1-diphenylphosphine)C₃₉H₃₂OP₂—
CatalystPalladium (II) acetateC₄H₈O₄Pd—
Solvent1,4-DioxaneC₄H₈O₂—
Product2-(2-(1,3-dimethyl-1H-pyrazol-5-ylamino)-5-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-4-ylamino)-6-methoxy-N-methylbenzamideC₂₀H₂₁F₃N₆O₂41.58%

The equation does not balance as written. That is usual for an experimental record: the source listed what it put in and what it measured, not a stoichiometric equation.

Conditions

Temperature
95 °C

Only the dimensions the source stated are listed. Anything absent here was not recorded, and it is not inferred from what the class usually needs.

Yield

  • 42% of 2-(2-(1,3-dimethyl-1H-pyrazol-5-ylamino)-5-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-4-ylamino)-6-methoxy-N-methylbenzamide.

Every recorded run making this product

2 runs of this class made the same product and differed in what else was in the flask. They are listed from the highest yield down, with this page's run marked.

ReactantsCatalystReagentsSolventTemp.TimeYield
2-(2-Chloro-5-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-4-ylamino)-6-methoxy-N-methylbenzamide; 1,3-Dimethyl-1H-pyrazol-5-amine1,1'-(9,9-Dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(1,1-diphenylphosphine); Palladium (II) acetateCesium carbonate1,4-Dioxane90 °C—44%
N-(1,3-dimethylpyrazol-5-yl)-4-iodo-5-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-2-amine; 2-amino-6-methoxy-N-methylbenzamide1,1'-(9,9-Dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(1,1-diphenylphosphine); Palladium (II) acetateCesium carbonate1,4-Dioxane95 °C—42% (this run)

Every value is as the source recorded it. A run with no yield was reported without one, and nothing here is averaged, modelled or filled in.

Procedure

Copied from the source record, unedited

2-amino-6-methoxy-N-methylbenzamide (19.45 g, 107.95 mmol), N-(1,3-dimethyl-1H-pyrazol-5-yl)-4-iodo-5-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-2-amine (27.5 g, 71.97 mmol) (9,9-dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(diphenylphosphine) (4.16 g, 7.20 mmol) diacetoxypalladium (0.808 g, 3.60 mmol) and cesium carbonate (42.2 g, 129.54 mmol) were suspended in dioxane (300 mL). The reaction was degased, purged with argon sereval times and heated to 95 °C overnight. The reaction mixture was allowed to cool to rt, the insolubles were removed by filtration, washed with EtOAc and the filtrate was concentrated. The resulting residue was triturated with dichloromethane (150 ml), filtered, washed with DCM to give EN03299-47-01 (8.5 g, 19.57 mmol, 27.2 %) The filtrate was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel elut

The source

This record comes from experimental reaction archive (ord-62ffd954c4be4ad5b0533c19b263b236). Open the source and check it against what is on this page.

  • experimental reaction archive record ord-62ffd954c4be4ad5b0533c19b263b236 from dataset "750 AstraZeneca ELN dataset" (url: https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article-details/60c9e3f37792a23bfdb2d471). No atom mapping is provided by the source.

    experimental record · quality medium · source

experimental reaction record.

How to read this record

This is one experiment, not a rule. It says that on one occasion these species were combined under these conditions and this came out. It does not say the reaction will give the same result on your substrate, and nothing on the page has been generalised into a claim that it would.

The pathway is a separate question, kept on separate pages. A mechanism here is the canonical arrow pushing for a class, run on real structures and labelled rule-derived. It is not evidence, and this record is not a mechanism.