Buchwald–Hartwig amination, record ord-0a36562a530a4f6bb99c0bf4c44fc018
One recorded run of this reaction. Below is what the source recorded, and nothing added to it.
What was in the flask
| Role | Species | Formula | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reactant | 3-(2-Chloropyridin-4-yl)oxy-2,6-dimethyl-pyridine | C₁₂H₁₁ClN₂O | |
| Reactant | 4-(Methylsulfonyl)aniline | C₇H₉NO₂S | |
| Reagent | Cesium carbonate | CCs₂O₃ | |
| Catalyst | 1,1'-(9,9-Dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(1,1-diphenylphosphine) | C₃₉H₃₂OP₂ | |
| Catalyst | Palladium (II) acetate | C₄H₈O₄Pd | |
| Solvent | Dimethylacetamide | C₄H₉NO | |
| Product | 4-(2,6-Dimethylpyridin-3-yloxy)-N-(4-(methylsulfonyl)phenyl)pyridin-2-amine | C₁₉H₁₉N₃O₃S | 50.82% |
Conditions
- Temperature
- 150 °C
Yield
- 51% of 4-(2,6-Dimethylpyridin-3-yloxy)-N-(4-(methylsulfonyl)phenyl)pyridin-2-amine.
Procedure
Copied from the source record, unedited
In a 10 mL microwave reactor 3-(2-chloropyridin-4-yloxy)-2,6-dimethylpyridine (100 mg, 0.43 mmol) and 4-(methylsulfonyl)aniline (73.0 mg, 0.43 mmol) were dissolved in DMA (3 mL) to give a tan solution.To the resultant solution Cesium carbonate (0.068 mL, 0.85 mmol) was added and sparged with nitrogen for 1 minute. Then Palladium(II) acetate (6.70 mg, 0.03 mmol) and 9,9-Dimethyl-4,5-bis(diphenylphosphino)xanthene (29.6 mg, 0.05 mmol) were added and the reaction mixture was sealed. The reaction was heated to150 °C for 25 minutes in the biotage microwave.The reaction was cooled to room temperature and LCMS shows reaction was completed. Reaction mixture was filtered through Celite Bed and washed with Dichloromethane. Filtrate was subjected to concentration to get DMA solution which was given t
The source
This record comes from experimental reaction archive (ord-0a36562a530a4f6bb99c0bf4c44fc018). Open the source and check it against what is on this page.
experimental reaction archive record ord-0a36562a530a4f6bb99c0bf4c44fc018 from dataset "750 AstraZeneca ELN dataset" (url: https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article-details/60c9e3f37792a23bfdb2d471). No atom mapping is provided by the source.
How to read this record
This is one experiment, not a rule. It says that on one occasion these species were combined under these conditions and this came out. It does not say the reaction will give the same result on your substrate, and nothing on the page has been generalised into a claim that it would.
The pathway is a separate question, kept on separate pages. A mechanism here is the canonical arrow pushing for a class, run on real structures and labelled rule-derived. It is not evidence, and this record is not a mechanism.