Skip to the content
Browse the library

Buchwald–Hartwig amination: 6-chloro-2H-[1,3]dioxolo[4,5-b]pyridin-7-amine → N-[4-[(6-Chloro-[1,3]dioxolo[4,5-B]pyridin-7-Yl)amino]-2-Pyridyl]cyclopropanecarboxamide

71% yield, run at 100 °C, as recorded by experimental reaction archive. The written procedure is below. One of 2 recorded runs making this product; all of them are compared below.

verified record, 71% yield recorded, Not balanced as written, From experimental reaction archive

Reagents, catalysts and solvents are in the table below.

The atoms, from reactants to products

OCNCCCNCCClCNCCOCOCCNCCCCl
Reactants · 1/6
breakingformingbond order changesmapped atom that changes

Drawn from the record's atom map: which bonds break and which form between the reactants and products the source listed. It shows a change in connectivity, not a simulated trajectory and not a mechanism.

What was in the flask

RoleSpeciesFormulaYield
Reactant6-chloro-2H-[1,3]dioxolo[4,5-b]pyridin-7-amineC₆H₅ClN₂O₂—
ReactantN-(4-chloropyridin-2-yl)cyclopropanecarboxamideC₉H₉ClN₂O—
ReagentCesium carbonateCCs₂O₃—
Catalyst1,1'-(9,9-Dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(1,1-diphenylphosphine)C₃₉H₃₂OP₂—
CatalystPalladium (II) acetateC₄H₈O₄Pd—
Solvent1,4-DioxaneC₄H₈O₂—
ProductN-[4-[(6-Chloro-[1,3]dioxolo[4,5-B]pyridin-7-Yl)amino]-2-Pyridyl]cyclopropanecarboxamideC₁₅H₁₃ClN₄O₃70.91%

The equation does not balance as written. That is usual for an experimental record: the source listed what it put in and what it measured, not a stoichiometric equation.

Conditions

Temperature
100 °C

Only the dimensions the source stated are listed. Anything absent here was not recorded, and it is not inferred from what the class usually needs.

Yield

  • 71% of N-[4-[(6-Chloro-[1,3]dioxolo[4,5-B]pyridin-7-Yl)amino]-2-Pyridyl]cyclopropanecarboxamide.

Every recorded run making this product

2 runs of this class made the same product and differed in what else was in the flask. They are listed from the highest yield down, with this page's run marked.

CatalystReagentsSolventTemp.TimeYield
1,1'-(9,9-Dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(1,1-diphenylphosphine); Palladium (II) acetateCesium carbonate1,4-Dioxane100 °C—71% (this run)
1,1'-(9,9-Dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(1,1-diphenylphosphine); (1E,4E)-1,5-diphenylpenta-1,4-dien-3-one; palladium1,8-Diazabicyclo(5.4.0)undec-7-eneToluene130 °C—33%

Every value is as the source recorded it. A run with no yield was reported without one, and nothing here is averaged, modelled or filled in.

Procedure

Copied from the source record, unedited

A mixture of N-(4-chloropyridin-2-yl)cyclopropanecarboxamide (1 g, 5.09 mmol), 6-chloro-[1,3]dioxolo[4,5-b]pyridin-7-amine (0.878 g, 5.09 mmol), (9,9-dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(diphenylphosphine) (0.324 g, 0.56 mmol), diacetoxypalladium (0.090 g, 0.40 mmol), cesium carbonate (4.14 g, 12.71 mmol) and dioxane (18 mL) was degased, purged (x3) with argon and heated to reflux over a period of 4 hours in an oil bath (110°C). The reaction was complete. The reaction mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature diluted with water (25ml), a saturated solution of NH4Cl (35ml). Extraction with dichloromethane (x2), the organic was washed with a saturated aqueous solution of brine, dried over magnesium sulfate and concentrated. The crude product was purified by flash chromatography on silica

The source

This record comes from experimental reaction archive (ord-97d4ec8781d24990b921a4f59e0aac9e). Open the source and check it against what is on this page.

  • experimental reaction archive record ord-97d4ec8781d24990b921a4f59e0aac9e from dataset "750 AstraZeneca ELN dataset" (url: https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article-details/60c9e3f37792a23bfdb2d471). No atom mapping is provided by the source.

    experimental record · quality medium · source

experimental reaction record.

How to read this record

This is one experiment, not a rule. It says that on one occasion these species were combined under these conditions and this came out. It does not say the reaction will give the same result on your substrate, and nothing on the page has been generalised into a claim that it would.

The pathway is a separate question, kept on separate pages. A mechanism here is the canonical arrow pushing for a class, run on real structures and labelled rule-derived. It is not evidence, and this record is not a mechanism.