Skip to the content
Browse the library

Buchwald–Hartwig amination: 3-Bromoanisole → 1-(3-Methoxyphenyl)piperidine-4-carbonitrile

54% yield, run at 100 °C, as recorded by experimental reaction archive. The written procedure is below.

verified record, 54% yield recorded, Not balanced as written, From experimental reaction archive

Reagents, catalysts and solvents are in the table below.

The atoms, from reactants to products

COCCCCCNCCCCNCCCBr
Reactants · 1/6
breakingformingbond order changesmapped atom that changes

Drawn from the record's atom map: which bonds break and which form between the reactants and products the source listed. It shows a change in connectivity, not a simulated trajectory and not a mechanism.

What was in the flask

RoleSpeciesFormulaYield
Reactant3-BromoanisoleC₇H₇BrO—
Reactant4-CyanopiperidineC₆H₁₀N₂—
Reagentlithium bis(trimethylsilyl)azanideC₆H₁₈LiNSi₂—
Catalyst2,8,9-Triisobutyl-2,5,8,9-tetraaza-1-phosphabicyclo(3.3.3)undecaneC₁₈H₃₉N₄P—
CatalystPalladium (II) acetateC₄H₈O₄Pd—
SolventTolueneC₇H₈—
Product1-(3-Methoxyphenyl)piperidine-4-carbonitrileC₁₃H₁₆N₂O54.48%

The equation does not balance as written. That is usual for an experimental record: the source listed what it put in and what it measured, not a stoichiometric equation.

Conditions

Temperature
100 °C

Only the dimensions the source stated are listed. Anything absent here was not recorded, and it is not inferred from what the class usually needs.

Yield

  • 54% of 1-(3-Methoxyphenyl)piperidine-4-carbonitrile.

Procedure

Copied from the source record, unedited

piperidine-4-carbonitrile (0.353 g, 3.21 mmol); 1-bromo-3-methoxybenzene (0.339 mL, 2.67 mmol) and diacetoxypalladium (0.120 g, 0.53 mmol) were thoroughly placed under an inert atmoshere. To this was added 2,8,9-triisobutyl-2,5,8,9-tetraaza-1-phosphabicyclo[3.3.3]undecane (0.037 g, 0.11 mmol); LITHIUM BIS(TRIMETHYLSILYL)AMIDE (6.15 mL, 6.15 mmol) and toluene (10 mL). The resultant mixture was stirred overnight at 100 °C (suspect that it did not need overnight. Equal vol of DCM was added and the reaction mixture filtered. Removal of the solvent under reduced pressure gave a dark brown gum. The crude product was purified by flash Silica chromatography {CombiFlash Companion - Presearch Ltd}, column size = 12 g , flow rate = 30 ml / min, elution gradient 0 to 30% EtOAc in isohexane over 10 m

The source

This record comes from experimental reaction archive (ord-fa6037d0d8a544539857cac2da5223a4). Open the source and check it against what is on this page.

  • experimental reaction archive record ord-fa6037d0d8a544539857cac2da5223a4 from dataset "750 AstraZeneca ELN dataset" (url: https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article-details/60c9e3f37792a23bfdb2d471). No atom mapping is provided by the source.

    experimental record · quality medium · source

experimental reaction record.

How to read this record

This is one experiment, not a rule. It says that on one occasion these species were combined under these conditions and this came out. It does not say the reaction will give the same result on your substrate, and nothing on the page has been generalised into a claim that it would.

The pathway is a separate question, kept on separate pages. A mechanism here is the canonical arrow pushing for a class, run on real structures and labelled rule-derived. It is not evidence, and this record is not a mechanism.