Skip to the content
Browse the library

Buchwald–Hartwig amination, record ord-440516e4fe3840ea9e61ffe304b26650

One recorded run of this reaction. Below is what the source recorded, and nothing added to it.

verified record36% yield recordedNot balanced as writtenFrom experimental reaction archive

Reactants and products as the record gives them. Reagents, catalysts and solvents are listed below rather than drawn.

Open this record in the Reaction LabThe atom map, the animation and the records that run the same transformation.

What was in the flask

RoleSpeciesFormulaYield
Reactantp-ToluidineC₇H₉N
Reactant4-IodoanisoleC₇H₇IO
ReagentMTBD 25C₈H₁₅N₃
Reagent1,2-BenzisoxazoleC₇H₅NO
Catalystt-BuBrettPhosC₄₄H₅₉F₃NO₅PPdS
SolventDimethyl SulfoxideC₂H₆OS
SolventDimethyl SulfoxideC₂H₆OS
SolventDimethyl SulfoxideC₂H₆OS
SolventDimethyl SulfoxideC₂H₆OS
SolventDimethyl SulfoxideC₂H₆OS
Product4-Methoxy-4'-methyldiphenylamineC₁₄H₁₅NO35.51%

The equation does not balance as written. That is usual for an experimental record: the source listed what it put in and what it measured, not a stoichiometric equation.

Conditions

Temperature
60 °C
Duration
16 hours

Only the dimensions the source stated are listed. Anything absent here was not recorded, and it is not inferred from what the class usually needs.

Yield

  • 36% of 4-Methoxy-4'-methyldiphenylamine.

Procedure

Copied from the source record, unedited

These solutions were added to a 384- well source plate (80 µL per well). The Mosquito HTS liquid handling robot was used to dose each of these solutions (200 nL each) into a 1536-well plate.

The source

This record comes from experimental reaction archive (ord-440516e4fe3840ea9e61ffe304b26650). Open the source and check it against what is on this page.

  • experimental reaction archive record ord-440516e4fe3840ea9e61ffe304b26650 from dataset "Ahneman" (doi: 10.1126/science.aar5169). No atom mapping is provided by the source.

    experimental record · quality high · source

experimental reaction record.

How to read this record

This is one experiment, not a rule. It says that on one occasion these species were combined under these conditions and this came out. It does not say the reaction will give the same result on your substrate, and nothing on the page has been generalised into a claim that it would.

The pathway is a separate question, kept on separate pages. A mechanism here is the canonical arrow pushing for a class, run on real structures and labelled rule-derived. It is not evidence, and this record is not a mechanism.