Skip to the content
Browse the library

Buchwald–Hartwig amination: 1,3-Dimethyl-1H-pyrazol-5-amine → 2-[[2-[(2,5-dimethylpyrazol-3-yl)amino]-5-(trifluoromethyl)-4-pyridyl]amino]-4-fluoro-N-methyl-benzamide

56% yield, run at 90 °C, as recorded by experimental reaction archive. The written procedure is below. One of 2 recorded runs making this product; all of them are compared below.

verified record, 56% yield recorded, Not balanced as written, From experimental reaction archive

Reagents, catalysts and solvents are in the table below.

The atoms, from reactants to products

CNCOCCCCFCCNCCCNCCCCNNCNCCCFFFCl
Reactants · 1/6
breakingformingbond order changesmapped atom that changes

Drawn from the record's atom map: which bonds break and which form between the reactants and products the source listed. It shows a change in connectivity, not a simulated trajectory and not a mechanism.

What was in the flask

RoleSpeciesFormulaYield
ReactantCNC(=O)c1ccc(F)cc1Nc1cc(Cl)ncc1C(F)(F)FC₁₄H₁₀ClF₄N₃O—
Reactant1,3-Dimethyl-1H-pyrazol-5-amineC₅H₉N₃—
ReagentCesium carbonateCCs₂O₃—
Catalyst1,1'-(9,9-Dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(1,1-diphenylphosphine)C₃₉H₃₂OP₂—
CatalystPalladium (II) acetateC₄H₈O₄Pd—
Solvent1,4-DioxaneC₄H₈O₂—
Product2-[[2-[(2,5-dimethylpyrazol-3-yl)amino]-5-(trifluoromethyl)-4-pyridyl]amino]-4-fluoro-N-methyl-benzamideC₁₉H₁₈F₄N₆O55.5%

The equation does not balance as written. That is usual for an experimental record: the source listed what it put in and what it measured, not a stoichiometric equation.

Conditions

Temperature
90 °C

Only the dimensions the source stated are listed. Anything absent here was not recorded, and it is not inferred from what the class usually needs.

Yield

  • 56% of 2-[[2-[(2,5-dimethylpyrazol-3-yl)amino]-5-(trifluoromethyl)-4-pyridyl]amino]-4-fluoro-N-methyl-benzamide.

Every recorded run making this product

2 runs of this class made the same product and differed in what else was in the flask. They are listed from the highest yield down, with this page's run marked.

ReactantsCatalystReagentsSolventTemp.TimeYield
C14H10ClF4N3O; 1,3-Dimethyl-1H-pyrazol-5-amine1,1'-(9,9-Dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(1,1-diphenylphosphine); Palladium (II) acetateCesium carbonate1,4-Dioxane90 °C—56% (this run)
N-(1,3-dimethylpyrazol-5-yl)-4-iodo-5-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-2-amine; 2-amino-4-fluoro-N-methylbenzamide1,1'-(9,9-Dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(1,1-diphenylphosphine); Palladium (II) acetateCesium carbonate1,4-Dioxane100 °C—36%

Every value is as the source recorded it. A run with no yield was reported without one, and nothing here is averaged, modelled or filled in.

Procedure

Copied from the source record, unedited

2-(2-chloro-5-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-4-ylamino)-4-fluoro-N-methylbenzamide (8.9 g, 25.60 mmol), 1,3-dimethyl-1H-pyrazol-5-amine (3.41 g, 30.72 mmol), diacetoxypalladium (0.460 g, 2.05 mmol), (9,9-dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(diphenylphosphine) (2.370 g, 4.10 mmol) and cesium carbonate (10.01 g, 30.72 mmol) were suspended in 1,4-dioxane (111 ml). The reaction was degased, purged with nitrogen and heated to 90°C (internal temperature) for 4 hours _._ Reaction was concentrated to dryness. Residue was diluted with CH2Cl2/MeOH 9/1 (200 mL) and water (200 mL). Aqueous was extracted with CH2Cl2/MeOH 9/1 (100 mL). Combined organic layers were dried over MgSO4 and concentrated to dryness. The crude product was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel eluting with 0 to 5% methanol in et

The source

This record comes from experimental reaction archive (ord-a11b668f474546c6bffcfc85e307c94b). Open the source and check it against what is on this page.

  • experimental reaction archive record ord-a11b668f474546c6bffcfc85e307c94b from dataset "750 AstraZeneca ELN dataset" (url: https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article-details/60c9e3f37792a23bfdb2d471). No atom mapping is provided by the source.

    experimental record · quality medium · source

experimental reaction record.

How to read this record

This is one experiment, not a rule. It says that on one occasion these species were combined under these conditions and this came out. It does not say the reaction will give the same result on your substrate, and nothing on the page has been generalised into a claim that it would.

The pathway is a separate question, kept on separate pages. A mechanism here is the canonical arrow pushing for a class, run on real structures and labelled rule-derived. It is not evidence, and this record is not a mechanism.