Buchwald–Hartwig amination, record ord-8f9b18030951427ab1e1a3e32247196d
One recorded run of this reaction. Below is what the source recorded, and nothing added to it.
What was in the flask
| Role | Species | Formula | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reactant | (2R)-8-chloro-4-methyl-2-phenyl-3,5-dihydro-2H-pyrido[3,2-f][1,4]oxazepine | C₁₅H₁₅ClN₂O | |
| Reactant | 4-(3-Methyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)aniline | C₉H₁₀N₄ | |
| Reagent | Cesium carbonate | CCs₂O₃ | |
| Catalyst | 2-(Dicyclohexylphosphino)biphenyl | C₂₄H₃₁P | |
| Catalyst | Bis(dibenzylideneacetone)palladium | C₅₁H₄₂O₃Pd₂ | |
| Solvent | 1,2-Dimethoxyethane | C₄H₁₀O₂ | |
| Product | (R)-4-Methyl-N-(4-(3-methyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)phenyl)-2-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydropyrido[3,2-f][1,4]oxazepin-8-amine | C₂₄H₂₄N₆O | 0% |
Conditions
- Temperature
- 100 °C
Yield
- 0% of (R)-4-Methyl-N-(4-(3-methyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)phenyl)-2-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydropyrido[3,2-f][1,4]oxazepin-8-amine.
Procedure
Copied from the source record, unedited
A solution of (R)-8-chloro-4-methyl-2-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydropyrido[3,2-f][1,4]oxazepine (5.00 mg, 0.02 mmol) and 4-(3-methyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)aniline (3.17 mg, 0.02 mmol) in DME (.5 mL) was added via a syringe to a capped microwave vial containing Pd2(dba)3 (0.833 mg, 0.91 µmol), 2-(DICYCLOHEXYLPHOSPHINO)BIPHENYL (0.638 mg, 1.82 µmol) and Cs2CO3 (8.89 mg, 0.03 mmol) under an argon atmosphere. The resulting mixture was heated to 100°C in a microwavwe apparatus for 1 h and analyzed by LCMS. No product.
The source
This record comes from experimental reaction archive (ord-8f9b18030951427ab1e1a3e32247196d). Open the source and check it against what is on this page.
experimental reaction archive record ord-8f9b18030951427ab1e1a3e32247196d from dataset "750 AstraZeneca ELN dataset" (url: https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article-details/60c9e3f37792a23bfdb2d471). No atom mapping is provided by the source.
How to read this record
This is one experiment, not a rule. It says that on one occasion these species were combined under these conditions and this came out. It does not say the reaction will give the same result on your substrate, and nothing on the page has been generalised into a claim that it would.
The pathway is a separate question, kept on separate pages. A mechanism here is the canonical arrow pushing for a class, run on real structures and labelled rule-derived. It is not evidence, and this record is not a mechanism.