Buchwald–Hartwig amination, record ord-1e9ec853eb3e43adb71af85c977827e9
One recorded run of this reaction. Below is what the source recorded, and nothing added to it.
What was in the flask
| Role | Species | Formula | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reactant | 1,4-Dibromobenzene | C₆H₄Br₂ | |
| Reactant | 3-methylAzetidine | C₄H₉N | |
| Reagent | Cesium carbonate | CCs₂O₃ | |
| Catalyst | Binap, (A+-)- | C₄₄H₃₂P₂ | |
| Catalyst | Palladium (II) acetate | C₄H₈O₄Pd | |
| Solvent | Toluene | C₇H₈ | |
| Product | 1-(4-Bromophenyl)-3-methylazetidine | C₁₀H₁₂BrN | 84.74% |
Conditions
- Temperature
- 100 °C
Yield
- 85% of 1-(4-Bromophenyl)-3-methylazetidine.
Procedure
Copied from the source record, unedited
3-methylazetidine (0.5 g, 4.69 mmol), diacetoxypalladium (10.53 mg, 0.05 mmol), 2,2'-bis(diphenylphosphino)-1,1'-binaphthyl (0.058 g, 0.09 mmol) and cesium carbonate (3.67 g, 11.26 mmol), degassed toluene (15 mL) were heated at 100 °C over the weekend. The RM was filtered and washed with EtOAc the filtrate was then concentrated and the crude product purified by flash silica chromatography, elution gradient 20 to 30% EtOAc in heptane. Purest fractions were collected and combined with EN05604-93. The combined product was then recrystalised from EtOAc to give 1-(4-bromophenyl)-3-methylazetidine (0.899 g, 85 %).
The source
This record comes from experimental reaction archive (ord-1e9ec853eb3e43adb71af85c977827e9). Open the source and check it against what is on this page.
experimental reaction archive record ord-1e9ec853eb3e43adb71af85c977827e9 from dataset "750 AstraZeneca ELN dataset" (url: https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article-details/60c9e3f37792a23bfdb2d471). No atom mapping is provided by the source.
How to read this record
This is one experiment, not a rule. It says that on one occasion these species were combined under these conditions and this came out. It does not say the reaction will give the same result on your substrate, and nothing on the page has been generalised into a claim that it would.
The pathway is a separate question, kept on separate pages. A mechanism here is the canonical arrow pushing for a class, run on real structures and labelled rule-derived. It is not evidence, and this record is not a mechanism.