Skip to the content
Browse the library

Buchwald–Hartwig amination: 3,5-Dichloropyridazine → tert-butyl N-(5-chloropyridazin-3-yl)carbamate

100% yield, run at 80 °C, as recorded by experimental reaction archive. The written procedure is below.

verified record, 100% yield recorded, Not balanced as written, From experimental reaction archive

Reagents, catalysts and solvents are in the table below.

The atoms, from reactants to products

CCCCOCONCCCClCNNCl
Reactants · 1/6
breakingformingbond order changesmapped atom that changes

Drawn from the record's atom map: which bonds break and which form between the reactants and products the source listed. It shows a change in connectivity, not a simulated trajectory and not a mechanism.

What was in the flask

RoleSpeciesFormulaYield
Reactant3,5-DichloropyridazineC₄H₂Cl₂N₂—
Reactanttert-Butyl carbamateC₅H₁₁NO₂—
ReagentCesium carbonateCCs₂O₃—
Catalyst1,1'-(9,9-Dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(1,1-diphenylphosphine)C₃₉H₃₂OP₂—
CatalystPalladium (II) acetateC₄H₈O₄Pd—
Solvent1,4-DioxaneC₄H₈O₂—
Producttert-butyl N-(5-chloropyridazin-3-yl)carbamateC₉H₁₂ClN₃O₂100%

The equation does not balance as written. That is usual for an experimental record: the source listed what it put in and what it measured, not a stoichiometric equation.

Conditions

Temperature
80 °C

Only the dimensions the source stated are listed. Anything absent here was not recorded, and it is not inferred from what the class usually needs.

Yield

  • 100% of tert-butyl N-(5-chloropyridazin-3-yl)carbamate.

Procedure

Copied from the source record, unedited

**_April 15 2016_** 3,5-dichloropyridazine (1 g, 6.71 mmol), tert-butyl carbamate (3.93 g, 33.56 mmol), (9,9-dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(diphenylphosphane) (0.583 g, 1.01 mmol), PdOAc2 (0.452 g, 2.01 mmol) and CS2CO3 (4.37 g, 13.43 mmol) in 1,4-dioxane (20 mL) was degassed through recharged with nitrogen, and was heated at 80 °C overnight. **_April 18 2016_** LCMS showed 23% of the precursor @ 0.55 min (no mass ionization) left on a 2-min basic run. GCMS showed no precursor and 94% of an unknown @ 6.90 min (whihc might be the desired product but not ionizable) on a 10-min run. The reaction was cooled to RT. The crude mixture was concentrated to givr a dark-brown gum. The dark-brown gum was dissolved in EtOAc, washed with water, and evaporated to give a brown solid. The brown soli

The source

This record comes from experimental reaction archive (ord-5053ba4582cb4771951a27c38d53fae2). Open the source and check it against what is on this page.

  • experimental reaction archive record ord-5053ba4582cb4771951a27c38d53fae2 from dataset "750 AstraZeneca ELN dataset" (url: https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article-details/60c9e3f37792a23bfdb2d471). No atom mapping is provided by the source.

    experimental record · quality medium · source

experimental reaction record.

How to read this record

This is one experiment, not a rule. It says that on one occasion these species were combined under these conditions and this came out. It does not say the reaction will give the same result on your substrate, and nothing on the page has been generalised into a claim that it would.

The pathway is a separate question, kept on separate pages. A mechanism here is the canonical arrow pushing for a class, run on real structures and labelled rule-derived. It is not evidence, and this record is not a mechanism.