Skip to the content
Browse the library

Buchwald–Hartwig amination: 2,5-Dichloro-4-iodopyridine → 2-[(2,5-dichloro-4-pyridinyl)amino]-N-(methyloxy)benzamide

69% yield, run at 100 °C, as recorded by experimental reaction archive. The written procedure is below.

verified record, 69% yield recorded, Not balanced as written, From experimental reaction archive

Reagents, catalysts and solvents are in the table below.

The atoms, from reactants to products

CONCOCCCCCCNCCCClNCCClI
Reactants · 1/6
breakingformingbond order changesmapped atom that changes

Drawn from the record's atom map: which bonds break and which form between the reactants and products the source listed. It shows a change in connectivity, not a simulated trajectory and not a mechanism.

What was in the flask

RoleSpeciesFormulaYield
Reactant2,5-Dichloro-4-iodopyridineC₅H₂Cl₂IN—
Reactant2-Amino-N-methoxybenzamideC₈H₁₀N₂O₂—
ReagentCesium carbonateCCs₂O₃—
Catalyst1,1'-(9,9-Dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(1,1-diphenylphosphine)C₃₉H₃₂OP₂—
CatalystPalladium (II) acetateC₄H₈O₄Pd—
Solvent1,4-DioxaneC₄H₈O₂—
Product2-[(2,5-dichloro-4-pyridinyl)amino]-N-(methyloxy)benzamideC₁₃H₁₁Cl₂N₃O₂69.18%

The equation does not balance as written. That is usual for an experimental record: the source listed what it put in and what it measured, not a stoichiometric equation.

Conditions

Temperature
100 °C

Only the dimensions the source stated are listed. Anything absent here was not recorded, and it is not inferred from what the class usually needs.

Yield

  • 69% of 2-[(2,5-dichloro-4-pyridinyl)amino]-N-(methyloxy)benzamide.

Procedure

Copied from the source record, unedited

2,5-dichloro-4-iodopyridine (10.4 g, 37.97 mmol), 2-amino-N-methoxybenzamide (6.63 g, 39.87 mmol), cesium carbonate (14.85 g, 45.57 mmol) and (9,9-dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(diphenylphosphine) (1.648 g, 2.85 mmol) were suspended in 1,4-dioxane (130 mL). Nitrogen was bubbled through the mixture for 10 minutes then diacetoxypalladium (0.426 g, 1.90 mmol) was added. Flask was purged with nitrogen 3 times and heated to reflux for 16 hours. Reaction was allowed to cool to room temperature and diluted with CH2Cl2 (100 mL) (=> _trouble_ ) + MeOH (10 mL). Mixture was filtered _(filtrate is clear)_ and washed with CH2Cl2/MeOH 9/1 (2x100 mL) => _filtrate became troubled._ Filtrate was concentrated to dryness to afford crude as a dark brown solid (17.5 g). Filtered cake seemed to contain some

The source

This record comes from experimental reaction archive (ord-aaefdd638c464adeb91c856ec0ce39ed). Open the source and check it against what is on this page.

  • experimental reaction archive record ord-aaefdd638c464adeb91c856ec0ce39ed from dataset "750 AstraZeneca ELN dataset" (url: https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article-details/60c9e3f37792a23bfdb2d471). No atom mapping is provided by the source.

    experimental record · quality medium · source

experimental reaction record.

How to read this record

This is one experiment, not a rule. It says that on one occasion these species were combined under these conditions and this came out. It does not say the reaction will give the same result on your substrate, and nothing on the page has been generalised into a claim that it would.

The pathway is a separate question, kept on separate pages. A mechanism here is the canonical arrow pushing for a class, run on real structures and labelled rule-derived. It is not evidence, and this record is not a mechanism.