Skip to the content
Browse the library

Buchwald–Hartwig amination: 1-(6-Chloropyrimidin-4-yl)benzimidazole → 6-(benzimidazol-1-yl)-N-[5-[[(2R)-1-methylpyrrolidin-2-yl]methoxy]-2-pyridinyl]pyrimidin-4-amine

14% yield, run at 100 °C, as recorded by experimental reaction archive. The written procedure is below.

verified record, 14% yield recorded, Not balanced as written, From experimental reaction archive

Reagents, catalysts and solvents are in the table below.

The atoms, from reactants to products

CNCCCCCOCCCCNCCCNCNCCCCCCNCNNCCl
Reactants · 1/6
breakingformingbond order changesmapped atom that changes

Drawn from the record's atom map: which bonds break and which form between the reactants and products the source listed. It shows a change in connectivity, not a simulated trajectory and not a mechanism.

What was in the flask

RoleSpeciesFormulaYield
Reactant1-(6-Chloropyrimidin-4-yl)benzimidazoleC₁₁H₇ClN₄—
ReactantCN1CCC[C@@H]1COc1ccc(N)nc1C₁₁H₁₇N₃O—
Reagentsodium 2-methylpropan-2-olateC₄H₉NaO—
Catalyst1,1'-(9,9-Dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(1,1-diphenylphosphine)C₃₉H₃₂OP₂—
CatalystBis(dibenzylideneacetone)palladiumC₅₁H₄₂O₃Pd₂—
SolventTolueneC₇H₈—
Product6-(benzimidazol-1-yl)-N-[5-[[(2R)-1-methylpyrrolidin-2-yl]methoxy]-2-pyridinyl]pyrimidin-4-amineC₂₂H₂₃N₇O14.09%

The equation does not balance as written. That is usual for an experimental record: the source listed what it put in and what it measured, not a stoichiometric equation.

Conditions

Temperature
100 °C

Only the dimensions the source stated are listed. Anything absent here was not recorded, and it is not inferred from what the class usually needs.

Yield

  • 14% of 6-(benzimidazol-1-yl)-N-[5-[[(2R)-1-methylpyrrolidin-2-yl]methoxy]-2-pyridinyl]pyrimidin-4-amine.

Procedure

Copied from the source record, unedited

TRIS(DIBENZYLIDENEACETONE)DIPALLADIUM(0) (31.6 mg, 0.03 mmol) was added to (R)-5-((1-methylpyrrolidin-2-yl)methoxy)pyridin-2-amine (143 mg, 0.69 mmol), 1-(6-chloropyrimidin-4-yl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazole (159 mg, 0.69 mmol), sodium t-butoxide (99 mg, 1.03 mmol) and (9,9-dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(diphenylphosphine) (59.8 mg, 0.10 mmol) in toluene (6 mL) at 20°C under nitrogen. The resulting suspension was stirred at 100 °C for 16 hours then cooled to room temperature. LCMS analysis indicates no SM, product peak present. The reaction mixture was concentrated _in vacuo_. The residue was dissolved in DCM (100 mL) and washed with water (100 mL). The organic layer was passed through phase separating cartridge and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by flash si

The source

This record comes from experimental reaction archive (ord-2784ae4fbb2641c38c53b79f14f3e80f). Open the source and check it against what is on this page.

  • experimental reaction archive record ord-2784ae4fbb2641c38c53b79f14f3e80f from dataset "750 AstraZeneca ELN dataset" (url: https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article-details/60c9e3f37792a23bfdb2d471). No atom mapping is provided by the source.

    experimental record · quality medium · source

experimental reaction record.

How to read this record

This is one experiment, not a rule. It says that on one occasion these species were combined under these conditions and this came out. It does not say the reaction will give the same result on your substrate, and nothing on the page has been generalised into a claim that it would.

The pathway is a separate question, kept on separate pages. A mechanism here is the canonical arrow pushing for a class, run on real structures and labelled rule-derived. It is not evidence, and this record is not a mechanism.