Buchwald–Hartwig amination, record ord-879180a104c8430c87fe873fe28d1e66
One recorded run of this reaction. Below is what the source recorded, and nothing added to it.
What was in the flask
| Role | Species | Formula | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reactant | 2-Chloro-4-iodo-5-(trifluoromethyl)pyridine | C₆H₂ClF₃IN | |
| Reactant | 2-amino-5-fluoro-N-methoxybenzamide | C₈H₉FN₂O₂ | |
| Reagent | Cesium carbonate | CCs₂O₃ | |
| Catalyst | 1,1'-(9,9-Dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(1,1-diphenylphosphine) | C₃₉H₃₂OP₂ | |
| Catalyst | Palladium (II) acetate | C₄H₈O₄Pd | |
| Solvent | 1,4-Dioxane | C₄H₈O₂ | |
| Product | 2-[[2-Chloro-5-(trifluoromethyl)-4-pyridyl]amino]-5-fluoro-n-methoxy-benzamide | C₁₄H₁₀ClF₄N₃O₂ | 40.43% |
Conditions
- Temperature
- 90 °C
Yield
- 40% of 2-[[2-Chloro-5-(trifluoromethyl)-4-pyridyl]amino]-5-fluoro-n-methoxy-benzamide.
Procedure
Copied from the source record, unedited
2-chloro-4-iodo-5-(trifluoromethyl)pyridine (0.502 g, 1.63 mmol), 2-amino-5-fluoro-N-methoxybenzamide (0.344 g, 1.68 mmol), diacetoxypalladium (0.029 g, 0.13 mmol), (9,9-dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(diphenylphosphine) (0.151 g, 0.26 mmol) and cesium carbonate (0.638 g, 1.96 mmol) were weighed out in a microwave vial and sealed. dioxane (10.31 ml) was added and argon was let to bubble through the reaction mixture then it was stirred at 90 °C for 5 hours. The reaction mixture was allowed to cool to room temperature, silca gel was added and the mixture was concentrated to afford the crude, which was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel eluting with 20 to 50% ethyl acetate in petroleum ether. The solvent was evaporated to dryness to afford 2-(2-chloro-5-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-
The source
This record comes from experimental reaction archive (ord-879180a104c8430c87fe873fe28d1e66). Open the source and check it against what is on this page.
experimental reaction archive record ord-879180a104c8430c87fe873fe28d1e66 from dataset "750 AstraZeneca ELN dataset" (url: https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article-details/60c9e3f37792a23bfdb2d471). No atom mapping is provided by the source.
How to read this record
This is one experiment, not a rule. It says that on one occasion these species were combined under these conditions and this came out. It does not say the reaction will give the same result on your substrate, and nothing on the page has been generalised into a claim that it would.
The pathway is a separate question, kept on separate pages. A mechanism here is the canonical arrow pushing for a class, run on real structures and labelled rule-derived. It is not evidence, and this record is not a mechanism.