Skip to the content
Browse the library

Buchwald–Hartwig amination: 2-Acetylamino-4-aminotoluene → N-[5-({3-Cyano-7-[(1-Methyl-1h-Imidazol-4-Yl)amino]pyrazolo[1,5-A]pyrimidin-5-Yl}amino)-2-Methylphenyl]acetamide

29% yield, run at 100 °C, as recorded by experimental reaction archive. The written procedure is below.

verified record, 29% yield recorded, Not balanced as written, From experimental reaction archive

Reagents, catalysts and solvents are in the table below.

The atoms, from reactants to products

CCONCCCNCCCNCCNCCNNNCCCNCNCCCCCl
Reactants · 1/6
breakingformingbond order changesmapped atom that changes

Drawn from the record's atom map: which bonds break and which form between the reactants and products the source listed. It shows a change in connectivity, not a simulated trajectory and not a mechanism.

What was in the flask

RoleSpeciesFormulaYield
ReactantCn1cnc(Nc2cc(Cl)nc3c(C#N)cnn23)c1C₁₁H₈ClN₇—
Reactant2-Acetylamino-4-aminotolueneC₉H₁₂N₂O—
Reagentsodium 2-methylpropan-2-olateC₄H₉NaO—
Catalyst2-Dicyclohexylphosphino-2',4',6'-triisoprophylbiphenylC₃₃H₄₉P—
CatalystBis(dibenzylideneacetone)palladiumC₅₁H₄₂O₃Pd₂—
SolventDimethylacetamideC₄H₉NO—
ProductN-[5-({3-Cyano-7-[(1-Methyl-1h-Imidazol-4-Yl)amino]pyrazolo[1,5-A]pyrimidin-5-Yl}amino)-2-Methylphenyl]acetamideC₂₀H₁₉N₉O29.32%

The equation does not balance as written. That is usual for an experimental record: the source listed what it put in and what it measured, not a stoichiometric equation.

Conditions

Temperature
100 °C

Only the dimensions the source stated are listed. Anything absent here was not recorded, and it is not inferred from what the class usually needs.

Yield

  • 29% of N-[5-({3-Cyano-7-[(1-Methyl-1h-Imidazol-4-Yl)amino]pyrazolo[1,5-A]pyrimidin-5-Yl}amino)-2-Methylphenyl]acetamide.

Procedure

Copied from the source record, unedited

To a microwave vial containingN-(5-amino-2-methylphenyl)acetamide (0.120 g, 0.73 mmol), 5-chloro-7-(1-methyl-1H-imidazol-4-ylamino)pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine-3-carbonitrile (0.1 g, 0.37 mmol) ,sodium 2-methylpropan-2-olate (0.116 g, 1.21 mmol) and 2-Dicyclohexylphosphino-2',4',6'-tri-iso-propyl-1,1'-biphenyl (0.017 g, 0.04 mmol)was added DMA (2.2 ml). Vial was flushed with argon and to it was added Pd2(dba)3 (0.017 g, 0.02 mmol) and the reaction was heated in a MW reactor at 100 ° C for 60 min.Reaction was filtered, and filterate concentrated under reduced pressure to give dark red gum. This was suspended in 10% MeOH : DCM (10 ml) filtered and filterate concentrated to give crude solid. This was purified by flash column using 5-8% MeoH :DCM (1% NH4OH) to give 75 mg of pale yellow solid (EN0

The source

This record comes from experimental reaction archive (ord-85b6b1948aa842f2a19dc52c1d84fd97). Open the source and check it against what is on this page.

  • experimental reaction archive record ord-85b6b1948aa842f2a19dc52c1d84fd97 from dataset "750 AstraZeneca ELN dataset" (url: https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article-details/60c9e3f37792a23bfdb2d471). No atom mapping is provided by the source.

    experimental record · quality medium · source

experimental reaction record.

How to read this record

This is one experiment, not a rule. It says that on one occasion these species were combined under these conditions and this came out. It does not say the reaction will give the same result on your substrate, and nothing on the page has been generalised into a claim that it would.

The pathway is a separate question, kept on separate pages. A mechanism here is the canonical arrow pushing for a class, run on real structures and labelled rule-derived. It is not evidence, and this record is not a mechanism.