Skip to the content
Browse the library

Buchwald–Hartwig amination: N-(1,3-dimethylpyrazol-4-yl)-4-iodo-5-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-2-amine → 2-[[2-[(1,3-dimethylpyrazol-4-yl)amino]-5-(trifluoromethyl)-4-pyridyl]amino]-6-methoxy-N-methyl-benzamide

59% yield, run at 100 °C, as recorded by experimental reaction archive. The written procedure is below.

verified record, 59% yield recorded, Not balanced as written, From experimental reaction archive

Reagents, catalysts and solvents are in the table below.

The atoms, from reactants to products

CNCOCCNCCCNCCNCNCCNCCCFFFCCCCOCI
Reactants · 1/6
breakingformingbond order changesmapped atom that changes

Drawn from the record's atom map: which bonds break and which form between the reactants and products the source listed. It shows a change in connectivity, not a simulated trajectory and not a mechanism.

What was in the flask

RoleSpeciesFormulaYield
ReactantN-(1,3-dimethylpyrazol-4-yl)-4-iodo-5-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-2-amineC₁₁H₁₀F₃IN₄—
Reactant2-amino-6-methoxy-N-methylbenzamideC₉H₁₂N₂O₂—
ReagentCesium carbonateCCs₂O₃—
Catalyst1,1'-(9,9-Dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(1,1-diphenylphosphine)C₃₉H₃₂OP₂—
CatalystPalladium (II) acetateC₄H₈O₄Pd—
Solvent1,4-DioxaneC₄H₈O₂—
Product2-[[2-[(1,3-dimethylpyrazol-4-yl)amino]-5-(trifluoromethyl)-4-pyridyl]amino]-6-methoxy-N-methyl-benzamideC₂₀H₂₁F₃N₆O₂58.53%

The equation does not balance as written. That is usual for an experimental record: the source listed what it put in and what it measured, not a stoichiometric equation.

Conditions

Temperature
100 °C

Only the dimensions the source stated are listed. Anything absent here was not recorded, and it is not inferred from what the class usually needs.

Yield

  • 59% of 2-[[2-[(1,3-dimethylpyrazol-4-yl)amino]-5-(trifluoromethyl)-4-pyridyl]amino]-6-methoxy-N-methyl-benzamide.

Procedure

Copied from the source record, unedited

To a stirred solution of N-(1,3-dimethyl-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-4-iodo-5-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-2-amine (26 g, 68.04 mmol) and 2-amino-6-methoxy-N-methylbenzamide (18.39 g, 102.06 mmol) in dioxane (300 mL) is added cesium carbonate (39.9 g, 122.47 mmol), (9,9-dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(diphenylphosphine) (3.94 g, 6.80 mmol) and diacetoxypalladium (0.764 g, 3.40 mmol). Mixture was degassed 3 times with N2 and heated to 100°C overnight. LCMS crude seems OK. Reaction was cooled to room temperature then salts were filtered and the filtrate concentrated to afford a crude compound which was purified on silica, eluting with 5% MeOH in AcOEt. Solvent were evaporated to afford a gum which finished by crystallize in 100mL of CH2Cl2. Solid was filtered and dried to a constant weight to afford

The source

This record comes from experimental reaction archive (ord-10a49d7456a04dcab0790ed1d012aba2). Open the source and check it against what is on this page.

  • experimental reaction archive record ord-10a49d7456a04dcab0790ed1d012aba2 from dataset "750 AstraZeneca ELN dataset" (url: https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article-details/60c9e3f37792a23bfdb2d471). No atom mapping is provided by the source.

    experimental record · quality medium · source

experimental reaction record.

How to read this record

This is one experiment, not a rule. It says that on one occasion these species were combined under these conditions and this came out. It does not say the reaction will give the same result on your substrate, and nothing on the page has been generalised into a claim that it would.

The pathway is a separate question, kept on separate pages. A mechanism here is the canonical arrow pushing for a class, run on real structures and labelled rule-derived. It is not evidence, and this record is not a mechanism.