Skip to the content
Browse the library

Buchwald–Hartwig amination: 2-Bromo-5-fluorotoluene → Tert-butyl 4-(4-fluoro-2-methylphenyl)piperazine-1-carboxylate

16% yield, run at 110 °C, as recorded by experimental reaction archive. The written procedure is below.

verified record, 16% yield recorded, Not balanced as written, From experimental reaction archive

Reagents, catalysts and solvents are in the table below.

The atoms, from reactants to products

CCCCFCCCNCCNCOOCCCCCCBr
Reactants · 1/6
breakingformingbond order changesmapped atom that changes

Drawn from the record's atom map: which bonds break and which form between the reactants and products the source listed. It shows a change in connectivity, not a simulated trajectory and not a mechanism.

What was in the flask

RoleSpeciesFormulaYield
Reactant2-Bromo-5-fluorotolueneC₇H₆BrF—
Reactanttert-Butyl piperazine-1-carboxylateC₉H₁₈N₂O₂—
ReagentCesium carbonateCCs₂O₃—
CatalystBinap, (A+-)-C₄₄H₃₂P₂—
CatalystBis(dibenzylideneacetone)palladiumC₅₁H₄₂O₃Pd₂—
SolventTolueneC₇H₈—
ProductTert-butyl 4-(4-fluoro-2-methylphenyl)piperazine-1-carboxylateC₁₆H₂₃FN₂O₂16.05%

The equation does not balance as written. That is usual for an experimental record: the source listed what it put in and what it measured, not a stoichiometric equation.

Conditions

Temperature
110 °C

Only the dimensions the source stated are listed. Anything absent here was not recorded, and it is not inferred from what the class usually needs.

Yield

  • 16% of Tert-butyl 4-(4-fluoro-2-methylphenyl)piperazine-1-carboxylate.

Procedure

Copied from the source record, unedited

In a 200ml flask was added 1-bromo-4-fluoro-2-methylbenzene (2 g, 10.58 mmol) and TERT-BUTYL 1-PIPERAZINECARBOXYLATE (2.365 g, 12.70 mmol), CESIUM CARBONATE (5.17 g, 15.87 mmol) , BINAP (0.791 g, 1.27 mmol) 18-CROWN-6 (0.336 g, 1.27 mmol), followed by toluene (25 ml). Degass the mixture. TRIS(DIBENZYLIDENEACETONE)DIPALLADIUM(0) (0.581 g, 0.63 mmol) was added. Heat at 110oC under nitrogen in an oil bath for overnight. The reaction mixture was diluted with ethyl acetate and filtered through celite. The Celite was washed with EtOAC. The EtOAC was concentrated down to give a brown oil. The crude product was purified by silica gel column(40g) and was eluted with 0% EtOAC/Hexane -50% EtOAC/Hexane. Yield: 0.5g Yellow oil.

The source

This record comes from experimental reaction archive (ord-7ef9bb9d04ab4703a01fe4c2dfba9490). Open the source and check it against what is on this page.

  • experimental reaction archive record ord-7ef9bb9d04ab4703a01fe4c2dfba9490 from dataset "750 AstraZeneca ELN dataset" (url: https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article-details/60c9e3f37792a23bfdb2d471). No atom mapping is provided by the source.

    experimental record · quality medium · source

experimental reaction record.

How to read this record

This is one experiment, not a rule. It says that on one occasion these species were combined under these conditions and this came out. It does not say the reaction will give the same result on your substrate, and nothing on the page has been generalised into a claim that it would.

The pathway is a separate question, kept on separate pages. A mechanism here is the canonical arrow pushing for a class, run on real structures and labelled rule-derived. It is not evidence, and this record is not a mechanism.