Skip to the content
Browse the library

Buchwald–Hartwig amination: (tert-Butyl) 6-bromonicotinate → Tert-butyl 6-piperidin-1-ylpyridine-3-carboxylate

62% yield, run at 80 °C, as recorded by experimental reaction archive. The written procedure is below.

verified record, 62% yield recorded, Not balanced as written, From experimental reaction archive

Reagents, catalysts and solvents are in the table below.

The atoms, from reactants to products

CCCCOCOCCCCNCCCCCNCBrHHHHHHHHHHH
Reactants · 1/6
breakingformingbond order changesmapped atom that changes

Drawn from the record's atom map: which bonds break and which form between the reactants and products the source listed. It shows a change in connectivity, not a simulated trajectory and not a mechanism.

What was in the flask

RoleSpeciesFormulaYield
Reactant(tert-Butyl) 6-bromonicotinateC₁₀H₁₂BrNO₂—
ReactantPiperidineC₅H₁₁N—
ReagentCesium carbonateCCs₂O₃—
CatalystBinap, (A+-)-C₄₄H₃₂P₂—
CatalystPalladium (II) acetateC₄H₈O₄Pd—
Solvent1,4-DioxaneC₄H₈O₂—
ProductTert-butyl 6-piperidin-1-ylpyridine-3-carboxylateC₁₅H₂₂N₂O₂61.94%

The equation does not balance as written. That is usual for an experimental record: the source listed what it put in and what it measured, not a stoichiometric equation.

Conditions

Temperature
80 °C

Only the dimensions the source stated are listed. Anything absent here was not recorded, and it is not inferred from what the class usually needs.

Yield

  • 62% of Tert-butyl 6-piperidin-1-ylpyridine-3-carboxylate.

Other recorded runs with the same starting material

No other run in the library makes this product. These runs of the same class start from one of the same reactants, which is the nearest company this record has.

Procedure

Copied from the source record, unedited

In a 100 mL round-bottomed flask was tert-butyl 6-bromonicotinate (516 mg, 2 mmol), piperidine (237 µl, 2.40 mmol), and CESIUM CARBONATE (977 mg, 3.00 mmol) in dioxane (9763 µl) to give a white suspension. The solution was degassed with N2 (g) fo 20 mins. PALLADIUM(II) ACETATE (22.45 mg, 0.10 mmol) and BINAP (62.3 mg, 0.10 mmol) were added under N2 (g) and the reaction was heated to 100 °C. Start Time: 01-Jul-10 1:10:32 PM -0400. The reaction was checked by LC-MS (complete), filtered, rinsed with DCM, concentrated in vacuo. _02 July 2010_ Purification by Iscos (25 g) using 100% Hexanes -> 50% EtOAc in Hexanes afforded a white solid. 325 mg obtained. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO- _d_ 6) d ppm 1.51 - 1.57 (m, 12 H) 1.57 - 1.77 (m, 5 H) 3.58 - 3.74 (m, 4 H) 6.78 - 6.92 (m, 1 H) 7.88 (dd, _J_ =9.1

The source

This record comes from experimental reaction archive (ord-b099625680284510ba7d7318538524ab). Open the source and check it against what is on this page.

  • experimental reaction archive record ord-b099625680284510ba7d7318538524ab from dataset "750 AstraZeneca ELN dataset" (url: https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article-details/60c9e3f37792a23bfdb2d471). No atom mapping is provided by the source.

    experimental record · quality medium · source

experimental reaction record.

How to read this record

This is one experiment, not a rule. It says that on one occasion these species were combined under these conditions and this came out. It does not say the reaction will give the same result on your substrate, and nothing on the page has been generalised into a claim that it would.

The pathway is a separate question, kept on separate pages. A mechanism here is the canonical arrow pushing for a class, run on real structures and labelled rule-derived. It is not evidence, and this record is not a mechanism.