Skip to the content
Browse the library

Buchwald–Hartwig amination: 2-Bromo-6-methylpyridine → 1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-3-methyl-1-[(Z)-1-(4-methylphenyl)prop-1-enyl]-3-(6-methyl-2-pyridinyl)urea

85% yield, run at 110 °C, as recorded by experimental reaction archive. The written procedure is below.

verified record, 85% yield recorded, Not balanced as written, From experimental reaction archive

Reagents, catalysts and solvents are in the table below.

The atoms, from reactants to products

CCCCCCCCCCNCONCCCCCCCNCCCCOCCCBr
Reactants · 1/6
breakingformingbond order changesmapped atom that changes

Drawn from the record's atom map: which bonds break and which form between the reactants and products the source listed. It shows a change in connectivity, not a simulated trajectory and not a mechanism.

What was in the flask

RoleSpeciesFormulaYield
Reactant2-Bromo-6-methylpyridineC₆H₆BrN—
ReactantC/C=C(/c1ccc(C)cc1)N(C(=O)NC)c1ccc(OC)cc1C₁₉H₂₂N₂O₂—
Reagentsodium 2-methylpropan-2-olateC₄H₉NaO—
Catalyst1,1'-(9,9-Dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(1,1-diphenylphosphine)C₃₉H₃₂OP₂—
CatalystBis(dibenzylideneacetone)palladiumC₅₁H₄₂O₃Pd₂—
SolventTolueneC₇H₈—
Product1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-3-methyl-1-[(Z)-1-(4-methylphenyl)prop-1-enyl]-3-(6-methyl-2-pyridinyl)ureaC₂₅H₂₇N₃O₂84.95%

The equation does not balance as written. That is usual for an experimental record: the source listed what it put in and what it measured, not a stoichiometric equation.

Conditions

Temperature
110 °C

Only the dimensions the source stated are listed. Anything absent here was not recorded, and it is not inferred from what the class usually needs.

Yield

  • 85% of 1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-3-methyl-1-[(Z)-1-(4-methylphenyl)prop-1-enyl]-3-(6-methyl-2-pyridinyl)urea.

Procedure

Copied from the source record, unedited

(Z)-1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-3-methyl-1-(1-p-tolylprop-1-enyl)urea (0.17200 g, 0.55 mmol),2-bromo-6-methylpyridine (0.126 ml, 1.11 mmol),SODIUM TERT-BUTOXIDE (0.160 g, 1.66 mmol),XANTPHOS (0.032 g, 0.06 mmol) and Pd2(dba)3 (0.025 g, 0.03 mmol) were dissolved intoluene (5.42 ml) and sparged under nitrogen for 15minutes . The resulting mixture was then heated to 110 °C for 29/03/2010 48 hours or unitil conversion was complete by TLC. NH4Cl (10 mL) was added 31-Mar-10 09:49:52 +0100 and the mixture was extracted twice (EtOAc 20 mL). The organic phases were combined, washed with brine (20 mL), dried (MgSO4) and the solvent removed under reduced pressure. The crude product was then purified by flash column chromatography to give (Z)-1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-3-methyl-3-(6-methylpyridin-2-yl)-1-(1-p-tolylp

The source

This record comes from experimental reaction archive (ord-411cbd769b2f48f9a0808a7d2919db15). Open the source and check it against what is on this page.

  • experimental reaction archive record ord-411cbd769b2f48f9a0808a7d2919db15 from dataset "750 AstraZeneca ELN dataset" (url: https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article-details/60c9e3f37792a23bfdb2d471). No atom mapping is provided by the source.

    experimental record · quality medium · source

experimental reaction record.

How to read this record

This is one experiment, not a rule. It says that on one occasion these species were combined under these conditions and this came out. It does not say the reaction will give the same result on your substrate, and nothing on the page has been generalised into a claim that it would.

The pathway is a separate question, kept on separate pages. A mechanism here is the canonical arrow pushing for a class, run on real structures and labelled rule-derived. It is not evidence, and this record is not a mechanism.