Skip to the content
Browse the library

Buchwald–Hartwig amination: 1-Bromo-3,5-difluorobenzene → 8-(1-(3,5-difluorophenyl)pyrrolidin-2-yl)-N,N-dimethyl-2-morpholino-4-oxo-4H-chromene-6-carboxamide

49% yield, run at 100 °C, as recorded by experimental reaction archive. The written procedure is below. One of 2 recorded runs making this product; all of them are compared below.

verified record, 49% yield recorded, Not balanced as written, From experimental reaction archive

Reagents, catalysts and solvents are in the table below.

The atoms, from reactants to products

CNCCOCCCCCCCNCCCFCCFCCOCNCCOCCCCOCCBr
Reactants · 1/6
breakingformingbond order changesmapped atom that changes

Drawn from the record's atom map: which bonds break and which form between the reactants and products the source listed. It shows a change in connectivity, not a simulated trajectory and not a mechanism.

What was in the flask

RoleSpeciesFormulaYield
Reactant1-Bromo-3,5-difluorobenzeneC₆H₃BrF₂—
ReactantN,N-dimethyl-2-morpholino-4-oxo-8-(pyrrolidin-2-yl)-4H-chromene-6-carboxamideC₂₀H₂₅N₃O₄—
ReagentCesium carbonateCCs₂O₃—
Catalyst1,1'-(9,9-Dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(1,1-diphenylphosphine)C₃₉H₃₂OP₂—
CatalystPalladium (II) acetateC₄H₈O₄Pd—
Solvent1,4-DioxaneC₄H₈O₂—
Product8-(1-(3,5-difluorophenyl)pyrrolidin-2-yl)-N,N-dimethyl-2-morpholino-4-oxo-4H-chromene-6-carboxamideC₂₆H₂₇F₂N₃O₄49.29%

The equation does not balance as written. That is usual for an experimental record: the source listed what it put in and what it measured, not a stoichiometric equation.

Conditions

Temperature
100 °C

Only the dimensions the source stated are listed. Anything absent here was not recorded, and it is not inferred from what the class usually needs.

Yield

  • 49% of 8-(1-(3,5-difluorophenyl)pyrrolidin-2-yl)-N,N-dimethyl-2-morpholino-4-oxo-4H-chromene-6-carboxamide.

Every recorded run making this product

2 runs of this class made the same product and differed in what else was in the flask. They are listed from the highest yield down, with this page's run marked.

CatalystReagentsSolventTemp.TimeYield
1,1'-(9,9-Dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(1,1-diphenylphosphine); Palladium (II) acetateCesium carbonate1,4-Dioxane100 °C—49% (this run)
1,1'-(9,9-Dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(1,1-diphenylphosphine); C45H37BrF2OP2Pd+2Cesium carbonate1,4-Dioxane80 °C—34%

Every value is as the source recorded it. A run with no yield was reported without one, and nothing here is averaged, modelled or filled in.

Procedure

Copied from the source record, unedited

diacetoxypalladium (2.90 mg, 0.01 mmol) was added to a stirred mixture of N,N-dimethyl-2-morpholino-4-oxo-8-(pyrrolidin-2-yl)-4H-chromene-6-carboxamide (120 mg, 0.32 mmol), (9,9-dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(diphenylphosphine) (15.89 mg, 0.03 mmol), 1-bromo-3,5-difluorobenzene (46.5 µl, 0.40 mmol) and cesium carbonate (158 mg, 0.48 mmol) suspended in 1,4-dioxane (3184 µl). The resulting suspension was degased with argon and then stirred at 100 °C for 20 hours. The mixture was evaporated and diluted with DMF. The reaction mixture was purified by preparative HPLC using a Waters X-Bridge reverse-phase column (C-18, 5 microns silica, 19 mm diameter, 100 mm length, flow rate of 40 ml / minute) and decreasingly polar mixtures of water (containing 0.2% ammonium carbonate) and acetonitrile a

The source

This record comes from experimental reaction archive (ord-770b2145b34144d1907205e1cdc145c0). Open the source and check it against what is on this page.

  • experimental reaction archive record ord-770b2145b34144d1907205e1cdc145c0 from dataset "750 AstraZeneca ELN dataset" (url: https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article-details/60c9e3f37792a23bfdb2d471). No atom mapping is provided by the source.

    experimental record · quality medium · source

experimental reaction record.

How to read this record

This is one experiment, not a rule. It says that on one occasion these species were combined under these conditions and this came out. It does not say the reaction will give the same result on your substrate, and nothing on the page has been generalised into a claim that it would.

The pathway is a separate question, kept on separate pages. A mechanism here is the canonical arrow pushing for a class, run on real structures and labelled rule-derived. It is not evidence, and this record is not a mechanism.