Skip to the content
Browse the library

Buchwald–Hartwig amination: 5-Chloro-7-(cyclopropylamino)pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine-3-carbonitrile → Acetamide, N-[5-[[3-cyano-7-(cyclopropylamino)pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidin-5-yl]amino]-2-[[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl]methylamino]phenyl]-

16% yield, run at 150 °C, as recorded by experimental reaction archive. The written procedure is below. One of 2 recorded runs making this product; all of them are compared below.

verified record, 16% yield recorded, Not balanced as written, From experimental reaction archive

Reagents, catalysts and solvents are in the table below.

The atoms, from reactants to products

CCONCCCNCCCNCCCNNCCCNCNCCCNCCCNCCCl
Reactants · 1/6
breakingformingbond order changesmapped atom that changes

Drawn from the record's atom map: which bonds break and which form between the reactants and products the source listed. It shows a change in connectivity, not a simulated trajectory and not a mechanism.

What was in the flask

The equation does not balance as written. That is usual for an experimental record: the source listed what it put in and what it measured, not a stoichiometric equation.

Conditions

Temperature
150 °C

Only the dimensions the source stated are listed. Anything absent here was not recorded, and it is not inferred from what the class usually needs.

Yield

  • 16% of Acetamide, N-[5-[[3-cyano-7-(cyclopropylamino)pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidin-5-yl]amino]-2-[[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl]methylamino]phenyl]-.

Every recorded run making this product

2 runs of this class made the same product and differed in what else was in the flask. They are listed from the highest yield down, with this page's run marked.

CatalystReagentsSolventTemp.TimeYield
1,1'-(9,9-Dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(1,1-diphenylphosphine); Bis(dibenzylideneacetone)palladiumCesium carbonateDimethylacetamide150 °C—29%
Di-tert-butyl(2',4',6'-tris(propan-2-yl)-(1,1'-biphenyl)-2-yl)phosphane; Bis(dibenzylideneacetone)palladiumCesium carbonate1,4-Dioxane150 °C—16% (this run)

Every value is as the source recorded it. A run with no yield was reported without one, and nothing here is averaged, modelled or filled in.

Procedure

Copied from the source record, unedited

Two reactions setup, each 600 mg scale. A 20 mL microwave reactor vial was charged with 5-chloro-7-(cyclopropylamino)pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine-3-carbonitrile (1.2 g, 5.14 mmol), N-(5-amino-2-((2-(dimethylamino)ethyl)(methyl)amino)phenyl)acetamide (1.414 g, 5.65 mmol), 2-Di-t-butylphosphino-2',4',6'-tri-i-propyl-1,1'-biphenyl (0.218 g, 0.51 mmol), Pd2dba3 (0.235 g, 0.26 mmol) and CS2CO3 (5.02 g, 15.41 mmol). The vessel was fitted with a septum and gas inlet and dioxane (20 mL) was added via syringe. The resulting suspension was stirred for 5 min under nitrogen. The septum and gas inlet was quickly replaced with a microwave vial cap and the mixture was heated at 150 degrees under microwave irradiation for 1h. Two reactions combined and filtered through celite. The filtrate concentrated and

The source

This record comes from experimental reaction archive (ord-5410161a80384996abaacdd18920aec7). Open the source and check it against what is on this page.

  • experimental reaction archive record ord-5410161a80384996abaacdd18920aec7 from dataset "750 AstraZeneca ELN dataset" (url: https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article-details/60c9e3f37792a23bfdb2d471). No atom mapping is provided by the source.

    experimental record · quality medium · source

experimental reaction record.

How to read this record

This is one experiment, not a rule. It says that on one occasion these species were combined under these conditions and this came out. It does not say the reaction will give the same result on your substrate, and nothing on the page has been generalised into a claim that it would.

The pathway is a separate question, kept on separate pages. A mechanism here is the canonical arrow pushing for a class, run on real structures and labelled rule-derived. It is not evidence, and this record is not a mechanism.