Skip to the content
Browse the library

Buchwald–Hartwig amination: 3-(6-Bromo-2-pyridinyl)-1,3-oxazinan-2-one → 3-[6-[(4-Methyl-1,3-thiazol-2-yl)amino]-2-pyridinyl]-1,3-oxazinan-2-one

44% yield, run at 120 °C, as recorded by experimental reaction archive. The written procedure is below.

verified record, 44% yield recorded, Not balanced as written, From experimental reaction archive

Reagents, catalysts and solvents are in the table below.

The atoms, from reactants to products

CCCSCNCCCCCNCCCOCONNBr
Reactants · 1/6
breakingformingbond order changesmapped atom that changes

Drawn from the record's atom map: which bonds break and which form between the reactants and products the source listed. It shows a change in connectivity, not a simulated trajectory and not a mechanism.

What was in the flask

RoleSpeciesFormulaYield
Reactant3-(6-Bromo-2-pyridinyl)-1,3-oxazinan-2-oneC₉H₉BrN₂O₂—
Reactant2-Amino-4-methylthiazoleC₄H₆N₂S—
ReagentCesium carbonateCCs₂O₃—
Catalyst1,1'-(9,9-Dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(1,1-diphenylphosphine)C₃₉H₃₂OP₂—
Catalyst(1E,4E)-1,5-diphenylpenta-1,4-dien-3-one; palladiumC₃₄H₂₈O₂Pd—
SolventTolueneC₇H₈—
Product3-[6-[(4-Methyl-1,3-thiazol-2-yl)amino]-2-pyridinyl]-1,3-oxazinan-2-oneC₁₃H₁₄N₄O₂S43.95%

The equation does not balance as written. That is usual for an experimental record: the source listed what it put in and what it measured, not a stoichiometric equation.

Conditions

Temperature
120 °C

Only the dimensions the source stated are listed. Anything absent here was not recorded, and it is not inferred from what the class usually needs.

Yield

  • 44% of 3-[6-[(4-Methyl-1,3-thiazol-2-yl)amino]-2-pyridinyl]-1,3-oxazinan-2-one.

Procedure

Copied from the source record, unedited

**_September 21 2015_** 4-methylthiazol-2-amine (85 mg, 0.74 mmol), 3-(6-bromopyridin-2-yl)-1,3-oxazinan-2-one (191 mg, 0.74 mmol), 3-(6-bromopyridin-2-yl)-1,3-oxazinan-2-one (191 mg, 0.74 mmol), (9,9-dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(diphenylphosphine) (43.1 mg, 0.07 mmol) and cesium carbonate (291 mg, 0.89 mmol) in toluene (5 mL) were microwaved at 120 °C under N2 for one hour. LCMS showed no precursors and 51% of the desired mass MH+291 @ 0.86 min on a 2-min basic run. The reaction mixture was diluted with EtOAc, washed with water, filtered, and evaporated to give a brown solid as the crude product. The crude product was added to a Biotage column, and was eluted with 15-100%EtOAc in Heptane. Collected fractions. **_September 22 2015_** Based on TLC and LCMS, the product fractions w

The source

This record comes from experimental reaction archive (ord-db902466b4d9464996daff204ba92575). Open the source and check it against what is on this page.

  • experimental reaction archive record ord-db902466b4d9464996daff204ba92575 from dataset "750 AstraZeneca ELN dataset" (url: https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article-details/60c9e3f37792a23bfdb2d471). No atom mapping is provided by the source.

    experimental record · quality medium · source

experimental reaction record.

How to read this record

This is one experiment, not a rule. It says that on one occasion these species were combined under these conditions and this came out. It does not say the reaction will give the same result on your substrate, and nothing on the page has been generalised into a claim that it would.

The pathway is a separate question, kept on separate pages. A mechanism here is the canonical arrow pushing for a class, run on real structures and labelled rule-derived. It is not evidence, and this record is not a mechanism.