Skip to the content
Browse the library

Buchwald–Hartwig amination → N-[5-[[3-cyano-7-(oxetan-3-ylamino)pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidin-5-yl]amino]-2-cyclopropyl-4-fluorophenyl]acetamide

24% yield, run at 140 °C, as recorded by experimental reaction archive. The written procedure is below. One of 2 recorded runs making this product; all of them are compared below.

verified record, 24% yield recorded, Not balanced as written, From experimental reaction archive

Reagents, catalysts and solvents are in the table below.

The atoms, from reactants to products

CCONCCCNCCCNCCOCNNCCCNCNCFCCCCCCl
Reactants · 1/6
breakingformingbond order changesmapped atom that changes

Drawn from the record's atom map: which bonds break and which form between the reactants and products the source listed. It shows a change in connectivity, not a simulated trajectory and not a mechanism.

What was in the flask

RoleSpeciesFormulaYield
ReactantN#Cc1cnn2c(NC3COC3)cc(Cl)nc12C₁₀H₈ClN₅O—
ReactantCC(=O)Nc1cc(N)c(F)cc1C1CC1C₁₁H₁₃FN₂O—
ReagentCesium carbonateCCs₂O₃—
CatalystDi-tert-butyl(2',4',6'-tris(propan-2-yl)-(1,1'-biphenyl)-2-yl)phosphaneC₂₉H₄₅P—
CatalystBis(dibenzylideneacetone)palladiumC₅₁H₄₂O₃Pd₂—
Solvent1,4-DioxaneC₄H₈O₂—
ProductN-[5-[[3-cyano-7-(oxetan-3-ylamino)pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidin-5-yl]amino]-2-cyclopropyl-4-fluorophenyl]acetamideC₂₁H₂₀FN₇O₂23.91%

The equation does not balance as written. That is usual for an experimental record: the source listed what it put in and what it measured, not a stoichiometric equation.

Conditions

Temperature
140 °C

Only the dimensions the source stated are listed. Anything absent here was not recorded, and it is not inferred from what the class usually needs.

Yield

  • 24% of N-[5-[[3-cyano-7-(oxetan-3-ylamino)pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidin-5-yl]amino]-2-cyclopropyl-4-fluorophenyl]acetamide.

Every recorded run making this product

2 runs of this class made the same product and differed in what else was in the flask. They are listed from the highest yield down, with this page's run marked.

CatalystReagentsSolventTemp.TimeYield
Di-tert-butyl(2',4',6'-tris(propan-2-yl)-(1,1'-biphenyl)-2-yl)phosphane; Bis(dibenzylideneacetone)palladiumCesium carbonate1,4-Dioxane140 °C—24% (this run)
Di-tert-butyl(2',4',6'-tris(propan-2-yl)-(1,1'-biphenyl)-2-yl)phosphane; Bis(dibenzylideneacetone)palladiumCesium carbonateDimethylacetamide145 °C—4%

Every value is as the source recorded it. A run with no yield was reported without one, and nothing here is averaged, modelled or filled in.

Procedure

Copied from the source record, unedited

dioxane (4 mL) was adde to the mixture of N-(5-amino-2-cyclopropyl-4-fluorophenyl)acetamide (100 mg, 0.48 mmol), 5-chloro-7-(oxetan-3-ylamino)pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine-3-carbonitrile (132 mg, 0.53 mmol),cesium carbonate (469 mg, 1.44 mmol), Pd2(dba)3 (44.0 mg, 0.05 mmol), di-tert-butyl(2',4',6'-triisopropylbiphenyl-2-yl)phosphine (40.8 mg, 0.10 mmol) in 5 ml microwave vial. N2 flow was bubbled through for 3 mins. Then the reaction solution was sealed with cap, degassed and refilled with argon 3 times. The resulting solution was heated at 140°C for 40 mins in microwave. LC/MS showed desired product as major peak. After the crude solution was concentrated, the crude residue was purified by chromatography (100% EtOAc to 3% MeOH in EtOAc). N-(5-(3-cyano-7-(oxetan-3-ylamino)pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrim

The source

This record comes from experimental reaction archive (ord-7d21d2aa9b9646bf85b8f593faa79359). Open the source and check it against what is on this page.

  • experimental reaction archive record ord-7d21d2aa9b9646bf85b8f593faa79359 from dataset "750 AstraZeneca ELN dataset" (url: https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article-details/60c9e3f37792a23bfdb2d471). No atom mapping is provided by the source.

    experimental record · quality medium · source

experimental reaction record.

How to read this record

This is one experiment, not a rule. It says that on one occasion these species were combined under these conditions and this came out. It does not say the reaction will give the same result on your substrate, and nothing on the page has been generalised into a claim that it would.

The pathway is a separate question, kept on separate pages. A mechanism here is the canonical arrow pushing for a class, run on real structures and labelled rule-derived. It is not evidence, and this record is not a mechanism.