Skip to the content
Browse the library

Buchwald–Hartwig amination: 3-(2-Chloro-5-methylpyrimidin-4-yl)pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyridine → 1-[5-Methoxy-6-[(5-methyl-4-pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyridin-3-ylpyrimidin-2-yl)amino]-2,3-dihydroindol-1-yl]ethanone

47% yield, run at 90 °C, as recorded by experimental reaction archive. The written procedure is below.

verified record, 47% yield recorded, Not balanced as written, From experimental reaction archive

Reagents, catalysts and solvents are in the table below.

The atoms, from reactants to products

COCCCCCCNCNCCCCCCNNCCCCCNNCCOCCCl
Reactants · 1/6
breakingformingbond order changesmapped atom that changes

Drawn from the record's atom map: which bonds break and which form between the reactants and products the source listed. It shows a change in connectivity, not a simulated trajectory and not a mechanism.

What was in the flask

RoleSpeciesFormulaYield
Reactant3-(2-Chloro-5-methylpyrimidin-4-yl)pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyridineC₁₂H₉ClN₄—
Reactant1-(6-Amino-5-methoxyindolin-1-yl)ethanoneC₁₁H₁₄N₂O₂—
ReagentCesium carbonateCCs₂O₃—
CatalystBinap, (A+-)-C₄₄H₃₂P₂—
CatalystPalladium (II) acetateC₄H₈O₄Pd—
Solvent1,4-DioxaneC₄H₈O₂—
Product1-[5-Methoxy-6-[(5-methyl-4-pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyridin-3-ylpyrimidin-2-yl)amino]-2,3-dihydroindol-1-yl]ethanoneC₂₃H₂₂N₆O₂46.76%

The equation does not balance as written. That is usual for an experimental record: the source listed what it put in and what it measured, not a stoichiometric equation.

Conditions

Temperature
90 °C

Only the dimensions the source stated are listed. Anything absent here was not recorded, and it is not inferred from what the class usually needs.

Yield

  • 47% of 1-[5-Methoxy-6-[(5-methyl-4-pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyridin-3-ylpyrimidin-2-yl)amino]-2,3-dihydroindol-1-yl]ethanone.

Procedure

Copied from the source record, unedited

A mixture of 3-(2-chloro-5-methylpyrimidin-4-yl)pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyridine (400 mg, 1.55 mmol), 1-(6-amino-5-methoxyindolin-1-yl)ethanone (341 mg, 1.55 mmol) and diacetoxypalladium (34.9 mg, 0.16 mmol) 2,2'-bis(diphenylphosphino)-1,1'-binaphthyl (97 mg, 0.16 mmol) cesium carbonate (759 mg, 2.33 mmol) were degassed with nitrogen then dioxane (7 mL) was added to mixture and the solution was degassed under vacuum and placed under nitrogen. The resulting suspension was stirred at 90 °C for 5hours. Control uplc/ms OK Control t.l.c : 100%EtOAc and 5%MeOH/CH2Cl2 After cooling, the mixture was filtered and the filtrate evaporated to dryness after addition of silica gel The crude product was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel 45g Merck column solid injectioneluting with 0 to 10%MeOH/Et

The source

This record comes from experimental reaction archive (ord-019ad9f92b5c40ecbf5416e8a6461063). Open the source and check it against what is on this page.

  • experimental reaction archive record ord-019ad9f92b5c40ecbf5416e8a6461063 from dataset "750 AstraZeneca ELN dataset" (url: https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article-details/60c9e3f37792a23bfdb2d471). No atom mapping is provided by the source.

    experimental record · quality medium · source

experimental reaction record.

How to read this record

This is one experiment, not a rule. It says that on one occasion these species were combined under these conditions and this came out. It does not say the reaction will give the same result on your substrate, and nothing on the page has been generalised into a claim that it would.

The pathway is a separate question, kept on separate pages. A mechanism here is the canonical arrow pushing for a class, run on real structures and labelled rule-derived. It is not evidence, and this record is not a mechanism.