Buchwald–Hartwig amination, record ord-fa122fe6774f45c5b7a107c1460052d3
One recorded run of this reaction. Below is what the source recorded, and nothing added to it.
What was in the flask
| Role | Species | Formula | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reactant | 8-Chloro-4-methyl-2-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydropyrido[3,2-f][1,4]oxazepine | C₁₅H₁₅ClN₂O | |
| Reactant | 4-(1H-imidazol-1-yl)aniline | C₉H₉N₃ | |
| Reagent | Cesium carbonate | CCs₂O₃ | |
| Catalyst | 2-(Dicyclohexylphosphino)biphenyl | C₂₄H₃₁P | |
| Catalyst | Palladium (II) acetate | C₄H₈O₄Pd | |
| Solvent | 1,2-Dimethoxyethane | C₄H₁₀O₂ | |
| Product | N-(4-(1H-imidazol-1-yl)phenyl)-4-methyl-2-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydropyrido[3,2-f][1,4]oxazepin-8-amine | C₂₄H₂₃N₅O | 41.47% |
Conditions
- Temperature
- 100 °C
Yield
- 41% of N-(4-(1H-imidazol-1-yl)phenyl)-4-methyl-2-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydropyrido[3,2-f][1,4]oxazepin-8-amine.
Procedure
Copied from the source record, unedited
[Reactants], 8-chloro-4-methyl-2-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydropyrido[3,2-f][1,4]oxazepine (0.120 g, 0.44 mmol), Palladium(II) acetate (9.81 mg, 0.04 mmol), 2-(Dicyclohexylphosphino)biphenyl (0.015 g, 0.04 mmol) and Cesium carbonate (0.427 g, 1.31 mmol) in DME (2.5 mL) were placed in a microwave vial and flushed with argon. The reaction mixture was then run in the microwave at 100°C for 1 hr. Reaction not complete. Run for another 30 minutes in the microwave. Still not complete. Added 0.1 eq of Palladium(II)acetate and 0.1 eq of 2-(Dicyclohexylphosphino)biphenyl and let the reaction mixture run in the microwave for additional 45 minutes. Reaction complete. The reaction mixture was filtrated through celite and the filtrate was concentrated. The crude product was purified by preparative chromatog
The source
This record comes from experimental reaction archive (ord-fa122fe6774f45c5b7a107c1460052d3). Open the source and check it against what is on this page.
experimental reaction archive record ord-fa122fe6774f45c5b7a107c1460052d3 from dataset "750 AstraZeneca ELN dataset" (url: https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article-details/60c9e3f37792a23bfdb2d471). No atom mapping is provided by the source.
How to read this record
This is one experiment, not a rule. It says that on one occasion these species were combined under these conditions and this came out. It does not say the reaction will give the same result on your substrate, and nothing on the page has been generalised into a claim that it would.
The pathway is a separate question, kept on separate pages. A mechanism here is the canonical arrow pushing for a class, run on real structures and labelled rule-derived. It is not evidence, and this record is not a mechanism.