Buchwald–Hartwig amination, record ord-055a4c71f284445f89aad15e03c56285
One recorded run of this reaction. Below is what the source recorded, and nothing added to it.
What was in the flask
| Role | Species | Formula | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reactant | 2-Bromo-6-methoxypyridine | C₆H₆BrNO | |
| Reactant | 1-[(Z)-1-(4-chlorophenyl)prop-1-enyl]-1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-3-methylurea | C₁₈H₁₉ClN₂O₂ | |
| Reagent | sodium 2-methylpropan-2-olate | C₄H₉NaO | |
| Catalyst | 1,1'-(9,9-Dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(1,1-diphenylphosphine) | C₃₉H₃₂OP₂ | |
| Catalyst | Bis(dibenzylideneacetone)palladium | C₅₁H₄₂O₃Pd₂ | |
| Solvent | Toluene | C₇H₈ | |
| Product | 1-[(Z)-1-(4-chlorophenyl)prop-1-enyl]-1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-3-(6-methoxy-2-pyridinyl)-3-methylurea | C₂₄H₂₄ClN₃O₃ | 71.95% |
Conditions
- Temperature
- 110 °C
Yield
- 72% of 1-[(Z)-1-(4-chlorophenyl)prop-1-enyl]-1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-3-(6-methoxy-2-pyridinyl)-3-methylurea.
Procedure
Copied from the source record, unedited
(Z)-1-(1-(4-chlorophenyl)prop-1-enyl)-1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-3-methylurea (0.400 g, 1.21 mmol),2-bromo-6-methoxypyridine (0.292 ml, 2.42 mmol),SODIUM TERT- BUTOXIDE (0.349 g, 3.63 mmol),XANTPHOS (0.070 g, 0.12 mmol) and Pd2(dba)3 (0.055 g, 0.06 mmol) were dissolved intoluene (11.80 ml) and sparged under nitrogen for 1 hour. The resulting mixture was then heated to 110 °C for 48 hours or unitil conversion was complete by TLC. NH4Cl (10 mL) was added and the mixture was extracted twice (EtOAc 20 mL). The organic phases were combined, washed with brine (20 mL), dried (MgSO4) and the solvent removed under reduced pressure. The crude product was then purified by flash column chromatography to give (Z)-1-(1-(4-chlorophenyl)prop-1-enyl)-1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-3-(6-methoxypyridin-2-yl)-3-methylurea (0.3
The source
This record comes from experimental reaction archive (ord-055a4c71f284445f89aad15e03c56285). Open the source and check it against what is on this page.
experimental reaction archive record ord-055a4c71f284445f89aad15e03c56285 from dataset "750 AstraZeneca ELN dataset" (url: https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article-details/60c9e3f37792a23bfdb2d471). No atom mapping is provided by the source.
How to read this record
This is one experiment, not a rule. It says that on one occasion these species were combined under these conditions and this came out. It does not say the reaction will give the same result on your substrate, and nothing on the page has been generalised into a claim that it would.
The pathway is a separate question, kept on separate pages. A mechanism here is the canonical arrow pushing for a class, run on real structures and labelled rule-derived. It is not evidence, and this record is not a mechanism.