Skip to the content
Browse the library

Buchwald–Hartwig amination: 5-Bromo-2-methoxy-4-(4-methyl-piperazin-1-yl)-phenylamine → N-[5-amino-4-methoxy-2-(4-methyl-1-piperazinyl)phenyl]carbamic acid 1,1-dimethylethyl ester

0% yield, run at 120 °C, as recorded by experimental reaction archive. The written procedure is below.

verified record, 0% yield recorded, Not balanced as written, From experimental reaction archive

Reagents, catalysts and solvents are in the table below.

The atoms, from reactants to products

COCCCNCCNCCCCNCOOCCCCCCNBr
Reactants · 1/6
breakingformingbond order changesmapped atom that changes

Drawn from the record's atom map: which bonds break and which form between the reactants and products the source listed. It shows a change in connectivity, not a simulated trajectory and not a mechanism.

What was in the flask

RoleSpeciesFormulaYield
Reactant5-Bromo-2-methoxy-4-(4-methyl-piperazin-1-yl)-phenylamineC₁₂H₁₈BrN₃O—
Reactanttert-Butyl carbamateC₅H₁₁NO₂—
ReagentCesium carbonateCCs₂O₃—
Catalyst1,1'-(9,9-Dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(1,1-diphenylphosphine)C₃₉H₃₂OP₂—
CatalystPalladium (II) acetateC₄H₈O₄Pd—
Solvent1,4-DioxaneC₄H₈O₂—
ProductN-[5-amino-4-methoxy-2-(4-methyl-1-piperazinyl)phenyl]carbamic acid 1,1-dimethylethyl esterC₁₇H₂₈N₄O₃0%

The equation does not balance as written. That is usual for an experimental record: the source listed what it put in and what it measured, not a stoichiometric equation.

Conditions

Temperature
120 °C

Only the dimensions the source stated are listed. Anything absent here was not recorded, and it is not inferred from what the class usually needs.

Yield

  • 0% of N-[5-amino-4-methoxy-2-(4-methyl-1-piperazinyl)phenyl]carbamic acid 1,1-dimethylethyl ester.

Procedure

Copied from the source record, unedited

To a suspension of 5-bromo-2-methoxy-4-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)aniline (50 mg, 0.17 mmol) in dioxane (4 mL) was added tert-butyl carbamate (24.39 mg, 0.21 mmol), cesium carbonate (81 mg, 0.25 mmol) and 9,9-dimethyl-4,5-bis(diphenylphosphino)xanthene (19.27 mg, 0.03 mmol). The resulting suspension was degassed and Palladium(II) acetate (3.74 mg, 0.02 mmol) was added. The mixture was degassed and stirred at 120 °C for 2 hours in the CEM microwave, then allowed to cool to ambient temperature. The reaction was incomplete so further cesium carbonate (81 mg, 0.25 mmol), 9,9-dimethyl-4,5-bis(diphenylphosphino)xanthene (19.27 mg, 0.03 mmol) and diacetoxyzinc (30.6 mg, 0.17 mmol) were added and the mixture was degassed. Further Palladium(II) acetate (3.74 mg, 0.02 mmol) was added, and the mixture w

The source

This record comes from experimental reaction archive (ord-4ae237ba7d264026afd182c3af660100). Open the source and check it against what is on this page.

  • experimental reaction archive record ord-4ae237ba7d264026afd182c3af660100 from dataset "750 AstraZeneca ELN dataset" (url: https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article-details/60c9e3f37792a23bfdb2d471). No atom mapping is provided by the source.

    experimental record · quality medium · source

experimental reaction record.

How to read this record

This is one experiment, not a rule. It says that on one occasion these species were combined under these conditions and this came out. It does not say the reaction will give the same result on your substrate, and nothing on the page has been generalised into a claim that it would.

The pathway is a separate question, kept on separate pages. A mechanism here is the canonical arrow pushing for a class, run on real structures and labelled rule-derived. It is not evidence, and this record is not a mechanism.