Skip to the content
Browse the library

Buchwald–Hartwig amination, record ord-1beac9199051463f81c658e8f7cb9a0d

One recorded run of this reaction. Below is what the source recorded, and nothing added to it.

verified record0% yield recordedNot balanced as writtenFrom experimental reaction archive

Reactants and products as the record gives them. Reagents, catalysts and solvents are listed below rather than drawn.

Open this record in the Reaction LabThe atom map, the animation and the records that run the same transformation.

What was in the flask

RoleSpeciesFormulaYield
ReactantTert-butyl 4-bromobenzoateC₁₁H₁₃BrO₂
ReactantEthyl 4-piperidinecarboxylateC₈H₁₅NO₂
ReagentCesium carbonateCCs₂O₃
CatalystBinap, (A+-)-C₄₄H₃₂P₂
CatalystBis(dibenzylideneacetone)palladiumC₅₁H₄₂O₃Pd₂
Solvent1,4-DioxaneC₄H₈O₂
ProductEthyl 1-(4-(tert-butoxycarbonyl)phenyl)piperidine-4-carboxylateC₁₉H₂₇NO₄0%

The equation does not balance as written. That is usual for an experimental record: the source listed what it put in and what it measured, not a stoichiometric equation.

Conditions

Temperature
110 °C

Only the dimensions the source stated are listed. Anything absent here was not recorded, and it is not inferred from what the class usually needs.

Yield

  • 0% of Ethyl 1-(4-(tert-butoxycarbonyl)phenyl)piperidine-4-carboxylate.

Procedure

Copied from the source record, unedited

1\. To a microwave tube was added tert-butyl 4-bromobenzoate (1.328 g, 5.16 mmol), ethyl piperidine-4-carboxylate (1.000 g, 5.16 mmol), Cs2CO3 (5.05 g, 15.49 mmol), Pd2dba3 (0.473 g, 0.52 mmol), and BINAP (0.643 g, 1.03 mmol). The mixture was dissolved in [Solvents] and sealed. The tube was de-gassed and inflated with N2. 2\. The reaction was heated at 110°C in oil-bath overnight. LCMS showed reaction complete. The reaction mixture was filter through celite pad and the solution was loaded to column for a ISCO purification (30% EtOAc in Hex). The purification is difficult with multiple by-products. Several ISCO purification was carried out and fractions were combined with other batches. Yield was poor.

The source

This record comes from experimental reaction archive (ord-1beac9199051463f81c658e8f7cb9a0d). Open the source and check it against what is on this page.

  • experimental reaction archive record ord-1beac9199051463f81c658e8f7cb9a0d from dataset "750 AstraZeneca ELN dataset" (url: https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article-details/60c9e3f37792a23bfdb2d471). No atom mapping is provided by the source.

    experimental record · quality medium · source

experimental reaction record.

How to read this record

This is one experiment, not a rule. It says that on one occasion these species were combined under these conditions and this came out. It does not say the reaction will give the same result on your substrate, and nothing on the page has been generalised into a claim that it would.

The pathway is a separate question, kept on separate pages. A mechanism here is the canonical arrow pushing for a class, run on real structures and labelled rule-derived. It is not evidence, and this record is not a mechanism.