Buchwald–Hartwig amination, record ord-ced8329d85d843b9adb25a3a7cf2fe09
One recorded run of this reaction. Below is what the source recorded, and nothing added to it.
What was in the flask
| Role | Species | Formula | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reactant | 2-Bromo-6-nitrobenzothiazole | C₇H₃BrN₂O₂S | |
| Reactant | Methylamine | CH₅N | |
| Reagent | Cesium carbonate | CCs₂O₃ | |
| Catalyst | 1,1'-(9,9-Dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(1,1-diphenylphosphine) | C₃₉H₃₂OP₂ | |
| Catalyst | Palladium (II) acetate | C₄H₈O₄Pd | |
| Solvent | 1,4-Dioxane | C₄H₈O₂ | |
| Product | N-Methyl-6-nitrobenzo[D]thiazol-2-amine | C₈H₇N₃O₂S | 6.19% |
Conditions
- Temperature
- 150 °C
Yield
- 6% of N-Methyl-6-nitrobenzo[D]thiazol-2-amine.
Procedure
Copied from the source record, unedited
methanamine (0.793 mL, 19.30 mmol), 2-bromo-6-nitrobenzo[d]thiazole (1 g, 3.86 mmol), (9,9-dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(diphenylphosphine) (0.268 g, 0.46 mmol), cesium carbonate (1.886 g, 5.79 mmol) and diacetoxypalladium (0.043 g, 0.19 mmol) were suspended in 1,4-dioxane (8 mL) and sealed into a microwave tube. The reaction was heated to 150°C for 30 minutes in the microwave reactor and cooled to RT. The crude product was purified by ion exchange chromatography, using an SCX column. The desired product was eluted from the column using 7M NH3/MeOH and pure fractions were evaporated to dryness to afford a crude product. The crude product was purified by flash silica chromatography, elution gradient 0 to 50% DCM in EtOAc. Pure fractions were evaporated to dryness to afford N-methyl-6-n
The source
This record comes from experimental reaction archive (ord-ced8329d85d843b9adb25a3a7cf2fe09). Open the source and check it against what is on this page.
experimental reaction archive record ord-ced8329d85d843b9adb25a3a7cf2fe09 from dataset "750 AstraZeneca ELN dataset" (url: https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article-details/60c9e3f37792a23bfdb2d471). No atom mapping is provided by the source.
How to read this record
This is one experiment, not a rule. It says that on one occasion these species were combined under these conditions and this came out. It does not say the reaction will give the same result on your substrate, and nothing on the page has been generalised into a claim that it would.
The pathway is a separate question, kept on separate pages. A mechanism here is the canonical arrow pushing for a class, run on real structures and labelled rule-derived. It is not evidence, and this record is not a mechanism.