Skip to the content
Browse the library

Buchwald–Hartwig amination: 4-iodo-5-(trifluoromethyl)-N-(1,3,5-trimethylpyrazol-4-yl)pyridin-2-amine → N-methoxy-2-[[5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-[(1,3,5-trimethylpyrazol-4-yl)amino]pyridin-4-yl]amino]benzamide

89% yield, run at 90 °C, as recorded by experimental reaction archive. The written procedure is below.

verified record, 89% yield recorded, Not balanced as written, From experimental reaction archive

Reagents, catalysts and solvents are in the table below.

The atoms, from reactants to products

CONCOCCCCCCNCCCNCCCNNCCCNCCCFFFI
Reactants · 1/6
breakingformingbond order changesmapped atom that changes

Drawn from the record's atom map: which bonds break and which form between the reactants and products the source listed. It shows a change in connectivity, not a simulated trajectory and not a mechanism.

What was in the flask

RoleSpeciesFormulaYield
Reactant4-iodo-5-(trifluoromethyl)-N-(1,3,5-trimethylpyrazol-4-yl)pyridin-2-amineC₁₂H₁₂F₃IN₄—
Reactant2-Amino-N-methoxybenzamideC₈H₁₀N₂O₂—
ReagentCesium carbonateCCs₂O₃—
Catalyst1,1'-(9,9-Dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(1,1-diphenylphosphine)C₃₉H₃₂OP₂—
CatalystPalladium (II) acetateC₄H₈O₄Pd—
Solvent1,4-DioxaneC₄H₈O₂—
ProductN-methoxy-2-[[5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-[(1,3,5-trimethylpyrazol-4-yl)amino]pyridin-4-yl]amino]benzamideC₂₀H₂₁F₃N₆O₂89.15%

The equation does not balance as written. That is usual for an experimental record: the source listed what it put in and what it measured, not a stoichiometric equation.

Conditions

Temperature
90 °C

Only the dimensions the source stated are listed. Anything absent here was not recorded, and it is not inferred from what the class usually needs.

Yield

  • 89% of N-methoxy-2-[[5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-[(1,3,5-trimethylpyrazol-4-yl)amino]pyridin-4-yl]amino]benzamide.

Other recorded runs with the same starting material

No other run in the library makes this product. These runs of the same class start from one of the same reactants, which is the nearest company this record has.

Procedure

Copied from the source record, unedited

2-amino-N-methoxybenzamide (541 mg, 3.26 mmol), (9,9-dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(diphenylphosphine) (166 mg, 0.29 mmol), cesium carbonate (1249 mg, 3.83 mmol) and diacetoxypalladium (38.7 mg, 0.17 mmol) were added to a stirred solution of 4-iodo-5-(trifluoromethyl)-N-(1,3,5-trimethyl-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)pyridin-2-amine (759 mg, 1.92 mmol) dissolved in dioxane (20 mL) in a µwave vial at RT. Argon was let to bubble in the mixture for 5 minutes and the resulting slurry was then stirred at 90 °C for 15 hours. Lcms showed complete reaction. The reaction mixture was allowed to cool to room temperature, diluted with dichloromethane, filtered, silica gel was added and the mixture was concentrated. The crude product was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel eluting with 30 to 100% ethyl

The source

This record comes from experimental reaction archive (ord-3db391e974974fdaa88ec87b15c89118). Open the source and check it against what is on this page.

  • experimental reaction archive record ord-3db391e974974fdaa88ec87b15c89118 from dataset "750 AstraZeneca ELN dataset" (url: https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article-details/60c9e3f37792a23bfdb2d471). No atom mapping is provided by the source.

    experimental record · quality medium · source

experimental reaction record.

How to read this record

This is one experiment, not a rule. It says that on one occasion these species were combined under these conditions and this came out. It does not say the reaction will give the same result on your substrate, and nothing on the page has been generalised into a claim that it would.

The pathway is a separate question, kept on separate pages. A mechanism here is the canonical arrow pushing for a class, run on real structures and labelled rule-derived. It is not evidence, and this record is not a mechanism.