Skip to the content
Browse the library

Buchwald–Hartwig amination, record ord-90e612e9a6744ee3af3c528f17e1b1ce

One recorded run of this reaction. Below is what the source recorded, and nothing added to it.

verified record61% yield recordedNot balanced as writtenFrom experimental reaction archive

Reactants and products as the record gives them. Reagents, catalysts and solvents are listed below rather than drawn.

Open this record in the Reaction LabThe atom map, the animation and the records that run the same transformation.

What was in the flask

RoleSpeciesFormulaYield
ReactantEthyl 7-bromobenzofuran-2-carboxylateC₁₁H₉BrO₃
Reactant1-(5-(2-(Piperazin-1-yl)ethyl)indolin-1-yl)ethanoneC₁₆H₂₃N₃O
ReagentCesium carbonateCCs₂O₃
Catalyst2-Dicyclohexylphosphino-2',4',6'-triisoprophylbiphenylC₃₃H₄₉P
CatalystBis(dibenzylideneacetone)palladiumC₅₁H₄₂O₃Pd₂
Solvent1,4-DioxaneC₄H₈O₂
ProductEthyl 7-(4-(2-(1-acetylindolin-5-yl)ethyl)piperazin-1-yl)benzofuran-2-carboxylateC₂₇H₃₁N₃O₄61.47%

The equation does not balance as written. That is usual for an experimental record: the source listed what it put in and what it measured, not a stoichiometric equation.

Conditions

Temperature
95 °C

Only the dimensions the source stated are listed. Anything absent here was not recorded, and it is not inferred from what the class usually needs.

Yield

  • 61% of Ethyl 7-(4-(2-(1-acetylindolin-5-yl)ethyl)piperazin-1-yl)benzofuran-2-carboxylate.

Procedure

Copied from the source record, unedited

06/05 2009 14:53:56 +0200 To ethyl 7-bromobenzofuran-2-carboxylate (0.460 g, 1.71 mmol) and 1-(5-(2-(piperazin-1-yl)ethyl)indolin-1-yl)ethanone (0.491 g, 1.79 mmol) (from EN02198-74) in dry degassed dioxane (8 mL) were added Cesium carbonate (0.724 g, 2.22 mmol), 2-Dicyclohexylphosphino-2',4',6'-triisopropylbiphenyl (0.081 g, 0.17 mmol) and Tris(dibenzylideneacetone)dipalladium(0) (0.078 g, 0.09 mmol) under argon and the reaction heated at 95°C overnight. After cooling to rt, water and DCM were added and the layers separated. The aq phase was extracted with DCM (3x). The combined org phases were washed with water, dried (MgSO4), filtered and evaporated. The crude was purified by flash (SiO2; DCM/MeOH 95/5) to give 0.485 g (61%) of the product as a yellow solid.

The source

This record comes from experimental reaction archive (ord-90e612e9a6744ee3af3c528f17e1b1ce). Open the source and check it against what is on this page.

  • experimental reaction archive record ord-90e612e9a6744ee3af3c528f17e1b1ce from dataset "750 AstraZeneca ELN dataset" (url: https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article-details/60c9e3f37792a23bfdb2d471). No atom mapping is provided by the source.

    experimental record · quality medium · source

experimental reaction record.

How to read this record

This is one experiment, not a rule. It says that on one occasion these species were combined under these conditions and this came out. It does not say the reaction will give the same result on your substrate, and nothing on the page has been generalised into a claim that it would.

The pathway is a separate question, kept on separate pages. A mechanism here is the canonical arrow pushing for a class, run on real structures and labelled rule-derived. It is not evidence, and this record is not a mechanism.