Buchwald–Hartwig amination, record ord-64de42ce56244836b512746d4c6a3fee
One recorded run of this reaction. Below is what the source recorded, and nothing added to it.
What was in the flask
| Role | Species | Formula | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reactant | N#CCN1Cc2ccc(Cl)nc2O[C@H](c2ccccc2)C1 | C₁₆H₁₄ClN₃O | |
| Reactant | 3-methoxy-4-(4-methyl-1H-imidazol-1-yl)aniline | C₁₁H₁₃N₃O | |
| Reagent | Cesium carbonate | CCs₂O₃ | |
| Catalyst | 2-(Dicyclohexylphosphino)biphenyl | C₂₄H₃₁P | |
| Catalyst | Palladium (II) acetate | C₄H₈O₄Pd | |
| Solvent | 1,2-Dimethoxyethane | C₄H₁₀O₂ | |
| Product | (R)-2-(8-(3-Methoxy-4-(4-methyl-1H-imidazol-1-yl)phenylamino)-2-phenyl-2,3-dihydropyrido[3,2-f][1,4]oxazepin-4(5H)-yl)acetonitrile | C₂₇H₂₆N₆O₂ | 7.81% |
Conditions
- Temperature
- 100 °C
Yield
- 8% of (R)-2-(8-(3-Methoxy-4-(4-methyl-1H-imidazol-1-yl)phenylamino)-2-phenyl-2,3-dihydropyrido[3,2-f][1,4]oxazepin-4(5H)-yl)acetonitrile.
Procedure
Copied from the source record, unedited
3-methoxy-4-(4-methyl-1H-imidazol-1-yl)aniline (195 mg, 0.96 mmol), (R)-2-(8-chloro-2-phenyl-2,3-dihydropyrido[3,2-f][1,4]oxazepin-4(5H)-yl)acetonitrile (288 mg, 0.96 mmol) Palladium acetate (21.55 mg, 0.10 mmol) and Cesium carbonate (938 mg, 2.88 mmol) were added in a microwave vial. The mixture was capped and flushed with argon. 1,2-dimethoxyethane (5 mL) was added, the reaction mixture was flushed with argon and the mixture was run in a microwave for 60 minutes at 100°C. Only after two additional additions of catalyst and ligand with 3h extra runtime was the reaction complete. The reaction mixture was filtrated through Celite and washed with dichloromethane. The filtrate was concentrated and the crude product was purified by preparative chromatography 3 times yielding (R)-2-(8-(3-methox
The source
This record comes from experimental reaction archive (ord-64de42ce56244836b512746d4c6a3fee). Open the source and check it against what is on this page.
experimental reaction archive record ord-64de42ce56244836b512746d4c6a3fee from dataset "750 AstraZeneca ELN dataset" (url: https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article-details/60c9e3f37792a23bfdb2d471). No atom mapping is provided by the source.
How to read this record
This is one experiment, not a rule. It says that on one occasion these species were combined under these conditions and this came out. It does not say the reaction will give the same result on your substrate, and nothing on the page has been generalised into a claim that it would.
The pathway is a separate question, kept on separate pages. A mechanism here is the canonical arrow pushing for a class, run on real structures and labelled rule-derived. It is not evidence, and this record is not a mechanism.