Skip to the content
Browse the library

Buchwald–Hartwig amination: 3-Iodobenzyloxybenzene → 2-Methyl-1-(3-phenylmethoxyphenyl)-6-(trifluoromethoxy)indole

40% yield, run at 120 °C, as recorded by experimental reaction archive. The written procedure is below. One of 3 recorded runs making this product; all of them are compared below.

verified record, 40% yield recorded, Not balanced as written, From experimental reaction archive

Reagents, catalysts and solvents are in the table below.

The atoms, from reactants to products

CCCCCCCOCFFFCCNCCCCCOCCCCCCCCI
Reactants · 1/6
breakingformingbond order changesmapped atom that changes

Drawn from the record's atom map: which bonds break and which form between the reactants and products the source listed. It shows a change in connectivity, not a simulated trajectory and not a mechanism.

What was in the flask

RoleSpeciesFormulaYield
Reactant3-IodobenzyloxybenzeneC₁₃H₁₁IO—
Reactant2-Methyl-6-(trifluoromethoxy)-1H-indoleC₁₀H₈F₃NO—
Reagentsodium 2-methylpropan-2-olateC₄H₉NaO—
Catalyst2-(Di-tert-butylphosphino)biphenylC₂₀H₂₇P—
CatalystBis(dibenzylideneacetone)palladiumC₅₁H₄₂O₃Pd₂—
Solvent1,4-DioxaneC₄H₈O₂—
Product2-Methyl-1-(3-phenylmethoxyphenyl)-6-(trifluoromethoxy)indoleC₂₃H₁₈F₃NO₂40.17%

The equation does not balance as written. That is usual for an experimental record: the source listed what it put in and what it measured, not a stoichiometric equation.

Conditions

Temperature
120 °C

Only the dimensions the source stated are listed. Anything absent here was not recorded, and it is not inferred from what the class usually needs.

Yield

  • 40% of 2-Methyl-1-(3-phenylmethoxyphenyl)-6-(trifluoromethoxy)indole.

Every recorded run making this product

3 runs of this class made the same product and differed in what else was in the flask. They are listed from the highest yield down, with this page's run marked.

ReactantsCatalystReagentsSolventTemp.TimeYield
1-(Benzyloxy)-3-bromobenzene; 2-Methyl-6-(trifluoromethoxy)-1H-indole2-(Di-tert-butylphosphino)biphenyl; Bis(dibenzylideneacetone)palladiumsodium 2-methylpropan-2-olateToluene80 °C—62%
3-Iodobenzyloxybenzene; 2-Methyl-6-(trifluoromethoxy)-1H-indole2-(Di-tert-butylphosphino)biphenyl; Bis(dibenzylideneacetone)palladiumsodium 2-methylpropan-2-olate1,4-Dioxane120 °C—40% (this run)
3-Iodobenzyloxybenzene; 2-Methyl-6-(trifluoromethoxy)-1H-indole2-(Di-tert-butylphosphino)biphenyl; Bis(dibenzylideneacetone)palladiumsodium 2-methylpropan-2-olateToluene120 °C—10%

Every value is as the source recorded it. A run with no yield was reported without one, and nothing here is averaged, modelled or filled in.

Procedure

Copied from the source record, unedited

EN04773-50, _Buchwald coupling,_ ** _J. Med. Chem. 2009, page 3846-3854 (changed: solvent to dioxane and bromide to iodide)._** The indole from 4773-41, 1-(benzyloxy)-3-iodobenzene, Pd2(dba)3, JohnPhos and KOtBu were dissolved in toluene. The mixture was warmed at 120 °C for 1h and ~40% conversion was observed on NMR. The reaction mixture was further heated at 80 °C for 16h and 40 h, see attached 1H-NMR for reaction progress. A comparison with 4773-51 shows that using dioxane or iodide gives a lower yield (slower reaction). Switching the solvent to toluene was explored in 4773-52. The reaction in this experiment showed that the Buchwald conditions worked. Reaction mixture was thrown away.

The source

This record comes from experimental reaction archive (ord-232b7429c3f0450bb3d4836c8a002e13). Open the source and check it against what is on this page.

  • experimental reaction archive record ord-232b7429c3f0450bb3d4836c8a002e13 from dataset "750 AstraZeneca ELN dataset" (url: https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article-details/60c9e3f37792a23bfdb2d471). No atom mapping is provided by the source.

    experimental record · quality medium · source

experimental reaction record.

How to read this record

This is one experiment, not a rule. It says that on one occasion these species were combined under these conditions and this came out. It does not say the reaction will give the same result on your substrate, and nothing on the page has been generalised into a claim that it would.

The pathway is a separate question, kept on separate pages. A mechanism here is the canonical arrow pushing for a class, run on real structures and labelled rule-derived. It is not evidence, and this record is not a mechanism.