Buchwald–Hartwig amination, record ord-29003fa36fea4ddebef83b29dba29c7c
One recorded run of this reaction. Below is what the source recorded, and nothing added to it.
What was in the flask
| Role | Species | Formula | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reactant | 1-Bromo-4-iodo-2-methoxybenzene | C₇H₆BrIO | |
| Reactant | 3-Oxetanamine | C₃H₇NO | |
| Reagent | sodium 2-methylpropan-2-olate | C₄H₉NaO | |
| Catalyst | 1,1'-(9,9-Dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(1,1-diphenylphosphine) | C₃₉H₃₂OP₂ | |
| Catalyst | Bis(dibenzylideneacetone)palladium | C₅₁H₄₂O₃Pd₂ | |
| Solvent | Toluene | C₇H₈ | |
| Product | N-(4-bromo-3-methoxyphenyl)oxetan-3-amine | C₁₀H₁₂BrNO₂ | 35.77% |
Conditions
- Temperature
- 80 °C
Yield
- 36% of N-(4-bromo-3-methoxyphenyl)oxetan-3-amine.
Procedure
Copied from the source record, unedited
A solution of 1-bromo-4-iodo-2-methoxybenzene (0.60 g, 1.92 mmol) dissolved in toluene (15 mL) was treated with oxetan-3-amine (0.140 g, 1.92 mmol), SODIUM TERT-BUTOXIDE (0.221 g, 2.30 mmol), XANTPHOS (0.111 g, 0.19 mmol) and TRIS(DIBENZYLIDENEACETONE)DIPALLADIUM(0) (0.044 g, 0.05 mmol) under nitrogen. The resulting mixture was stirred at 80 °C in a sealed tube for 2 hours. The reaction mixture was diluted with water (10 mL), and extracted with ethyl acetate (3x 20 mL). The organic was dried over MgSO4, filtered and evaporated to afford crude product. The crude product was purified by flash silica chromatography, elution 0-30% EtOAc in Heptane. Pure fractions were evaporated to dryness to afford N-(4-bromo-3-methoxyphenyl)oxetan-3-amine (0.177 g, 35.8 %) as a beige solid.
The source
This record comes from experimental reaction archive (ord-29003fa36fea4ddebef83b29dba29c7c). Open the source and check it against what is on this page.
experimental reaction archive record ord-29003fa36fea4ddebef83b29dba29c7c from dataset "750 AstraZeneca ELN dataset" (url: https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article-details/60c9e3f37792a23bfdb2d471). No atom mapping is provided by the source.
How to read this record
This is one experiment, not a rule. It says that on one occasion these species were combined under these conditions and this came out. It does not say the reaction will give the same result on your substrate, and nothing on the page has been generalised into a claim that it would.
The pathway is a separate question, kept on separate pages. A mechanism here is the canonical arrow pushing for a class, run on real structures and labelled rule-derived. It is not evidence, and this record is not a mechanism.