Buchwald–Hartwig amination, record ord-53e4c550d2a942e0b2b88b16dae21b0b
One recorded run of this reaction. Below is what the source recorded, and nothing added to it.
What was in the flask
| Role | Species | Formula | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reactant | 6-chloro-2H-[1,3]dioxolo[4,5-b]pyridin-7-amine | C₆H₅ClN₂O₂ | |
| Reactant | N-(4-chloropyridin-2-yl)cyclopropanecarboxamide | C₉H₉ClN₂O | |
| Reagent | Cesium carbonate | CCs₂O₃ | |
| Catalyst | 1,1'-(9,9-Dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(1,1-diphenylphosphine) | C₃₉H₃₂OP₂ | |
| Catalyst | Palladium (II) acetate | C₄H₈O₄Pd | |
| Solvent | 1,4-Dioxane | C₄H₈O₂ | |
| Product | N-[4-[(6-Chloro-[1,3]dioxolo[4,5-B]pyridin-7-Yl)amino]-2-Pyridyl]cyclopropanecarboxamide | C₁₅H₁₃ClN₄O₃ | 28.37% |
Conditions
- Temperature
- 150 °C
Yield
- 28% of N-[4-[(6-Chloro-[1,3]dioxolo[4,5-B]pyridin-7-Yl)amino]-2-Pyridyl]cyclopropanecarboxamide.
Procedure
Copied from the source record, unedited
N-(4-chloropyridin-2-yl)cyclopropanecarboxamide (0.8 g, 4.07 mmol), 6-chloro-[1,3]dioxolo[4,5-b]pyridin-7-amine (0.702 g, 4.07 mmol), (9,9-dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(diphenylphosphine) (0.282 g, 0.49 mmol), diacetoxypalladium (0.046 g, 0.20 mmol) and cesium carbonate (2.65 g, 8.14 mmol) were suspended in 1,4-dioxane (15 mL) and sealed into a microwave tube. The reaction was heated to 150 °C for 30 minutes in the microwave reactor and cooled to RT. The reaction mixture was evaporated and partitioned between EtOAc (50 mL) and water (50 mL). The mixture was filtered and the organic layer was dried over MgSO4, filtered and evaporated to afford crude product. The crude product was purified by flash silica chromatography, elution gradient 0 to 5% MeOH in DCM. Pure fractions were evaporate
The source
This record comes from experimental reaction archive (ord-53e4c550d2a942e0b2b88b16dae21b0b). Open the source and check it against what is on this page.
experimental reaction archive record ord-53e4c550d2a942e0b2b88b16dae21b0b from dataset "750 AstraZeneca ELN dataset" (url: https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article-details/60c9e3f37792a23bfdb2d471). No atom mapping is provided by the source.
How to read this record
This is one experiment, not a rule. It says that on one occasion these species were combined under these conditions and this came out. It does not say the reaction will give the same result on your substrate, and nothing on the page has been generalised into a claim that it would.
The pathway is a separate question, kept on separate pages. A mechanism here is the canonical arrow pushing for a class, run on real structures and labelled rule-derived. It is not evidence, and this record is not a mechanism.