Skip to the content
Browse the library

Buchwald–Hartwig amination: 2-[(2,5-dichloro-4-pyridinyl)amino]-N-(methyloxy)benzamide → Gsk-2256098

34% yield, run at 100 °C, as recorded by experimental reaction archive. The written procedure is below. One of 3 recorded runs making this product; all of them are compared below.

verified record, 34% yield recorded, Not balanced as written, From experimental reaction archive

Reagents, catalysts and solvents are in the table below.

The atoms, from reactants to products

CONCOCCCCCCNCCCNCCCCNNCCCNCCClCl
Reactants · 1/6
breakingformingbond order changesmapped atom that changes

Drawn from the record's atom map: which bonds break and which form between the reactants and products the source listed. It shows a change in connectivity, not a simulated trajectory and not a mechanism.

What was in the flask

RoleSpeciesFormulaYield
Reactant2-[(2,5-dichloro-4-pyridinyl)amino]-N-(methyloxy)benzamideC₁₃H₁₁Cl₂N₃O₂—
Reactant1-Isopropyl-3-methyl-1H-pyrazol-5-amineC₇H₁₃N₃—
ReagentCesium carbonateCCs₂O₃—
Catalyst1,1'-(9,9-Dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(1,1-diphenylphosphine)C₃₉H₃₂OP₂—
CatalystPalladium (II) acetateC₄H₈O₄Pd—
Solvent1,4-DioxaneC₄H₈O₂—
ProductGsk-2256098C₂₀H₂₃ClN₆O₂33.86%

The equation does not balance as written. That is usual for an experimental record: the source listed what it put in and what it measured, not a stoichiometric equation.

Conditions

Temperature
100 °C

Only the dimensions the source stated are listed. Anything absent here was not recorded, and it is not inferred from what the class usually needs.

Yield

  • 34% of Gsk-2256098.

Every recorded run making this product

3 runs of this class made the same product and differed in what else was in the flask. They are listed from the highest yield down, with this page's run marked.

CatalystReagentsSolventTemp.TimeYield
Binap, (A+-)-; Palladium (II) acetateCesium carbonate1,4-Dioxane100 °C—47%
1,1'-(9,9-Dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(1,1-diphenylphosphine); (1E,4E)-1,5-diphenylpenta-1,4-dien-3-one; palladiumsodium 2-methylpropan-2-olate1,4-Dioxane100 °C—36%
1,1'-(9,9-Dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(1,1-diphenylphosphine); Palladium (II) acetateCesium carbonate1,4-Dioxane100 °C—34% (this run)

Every value is as the source recorded it. A run with no yield was reported without one, and nothing here is averaged, modelled or filled in.

Procedure

Copied from the source record, unedited

2-(2,5-dichloropyridin-4-ylamino)-N-methoxybenzamide (200 mg, 0.64 mmol), 1-isopropyl-3-methyl-1H-pyrazol-5-amine (178 mg, 1.28 mmol) and cesium carbonate (313 mg, 0.96 mmol) were suspended in 1,4-dioxane (3 mL). Nitrogen was bubbled through mixture for 10 minutes. (9,9-dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(diphenylphosphine) (27.8 mg, 0.05 mmol) and diacetoxypalladium (7.19 mg, 0.03 mmol) were added and tube was sealed. Mixture was stirred at reflux overnight => _incomplete reaction_. Reaction was heated for a further 7 hours => _no evolution_. More Pd(OAc)2 and Xantphos were added, mixture was degassed with nitrogen and heated at reflux overnight => _complete_. Reaction was allowed to cool to room temperature, filtered, washed with CH2Cl2/MeOH (9/1, 10 mL) and concentrated to dryness. The c

The source

This record comes from experimental reaction archive (ord-0dc07c6e11344615900455301860696c). Open the source and check it against what is on this page.

  • experimental reaction archive record ord-0dc07c6e11344615900455301860696c from dataset "750 AstraZeneca ELN dataset" (url: https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article-details/60c9e3f37792a23bfdb2d471). No atom mapping is provided by the source.

    experimental record · quality medium · source

experimental reaction record.

How to read this record

This is one experiment, not a rule. It says that on one occasion these species were combined under these conditions and this came out. It does not say the reaction will give the same result on your substrate, and nothing on the page has been generalised into a claim that it would.

The pathway is a separate question, kept on separate pages. A mechanism here is the canonical arrow pushing for a class, run on real structures and labelled rule-derived. It is not evidence, and this record is not a mechanism.