Skip to the content
Browse the library

Buchwald–Hartwig amination: 2-[2-Chloro-5-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-4-ylamino]-N-methylbenzamide → N-methyl-2-[[5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-[(1,3,5-trimethylpyrazol-4-yl)amino]pyridin-4-yl]amino]benzamide

24% yield, run at 100 °C, as recorded by experimental reaction archive. The written procedure is below.

verified record, 24% yield recorded, Not balanced as written, From experimental reaction archive

Reagents, catalysts and solvents are in the table below.

The atoms, from reactants to products

CNCOCCCCCCNCCCNCCCNNCCCNCCCFFFCl
Reactants · 1/6
breakingformingbond order changesmapped atom that changes

Drawn from the record's atom map: which bonds break and which form between the reactants and products the source listed. It shows a change in connectivity, not a simulated trajectory and not a mechanism.

What was in the flask

RoleSpeciesFormulaYield
Reactant2-[2-Chloro-5-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-4-ylamino]-N-methylbenzamideC₁₄H₁₁ClF₃N₃O—
Reactant1,3,5-trimethyl-1H-pyrazol-4-amineC₆H₁₁N₃—
ReagentCesium carbonateCCs₂O₃—
Catalyst1,1'-(9,9-Dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(1,1-diphenylphosphine)C₃₉H₃₂OP₂—
CatalystPalladium (II) acetateC₄H₈O₄Pd—
Solvent1,4-DioxaneC₄H₈O₂—
ProductN-methyl-2-[[5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-[(1,3,5-trimethylpyrazol-4-yl)amino]pyridin-4-yl]amino]benzamideC₂₀H₂₁F₃N₆O24.43%

The equation does not balance as written. That is usual for an experimental record: the source listed what it put in and what it measured, not a stoichiometric equation.

Conditions

Temperature
100 °C

Only the dimensions the source stated are listed. Anything absent here was not recorded, and it is not inferred from what the class usually needs.

Yield

  • 24% of N-methyl-2-[[5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-[(1,3,5-trimethylpyrazol-4-yl)amino]pyridin-4-yl]amino]benzamide.

Other recorded runs with the same starting material

No other run in the library makes this product. These runs of the same class start from one of the same reactants, which is the nearest company this record has.

Procedure

Copied from the source record, unedited

2-(2-chloro-5-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-4-ylamino)-N-methylbenzamide (100 mg, 0.30 mmol), 1,3,5-trimethyl-1H-pyrazol-4-amine (76 mg, 0.61 mmol), cesium carbonate (119 mg, 0.36 mmol), (9,9-dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(diphenylphosphine) (28.1 mg, 0.05 mmol) and diacetoxypalladium (5.45 mg, 0.02 mmol) were suspended in dioxane (1.5 mL) and sealed into a tube. The reaction was degased, purged with nitrogen and heated to 100 °C for 18 hours. Reaction was filtered. The reaction mixture was purified by preparative HPLC using a Waters X-Bridge reverse-phase column (C-18, 5 microns silica, 19 mm diameter, 100 mm length, flow rate of 40 ml / minute) and decreasingly polar mixtures of water (containing 0.2% ammonium carbonate) and acetonitrile as eluent. The fractions containing the desired comp

The source

This record comes from experimental reaction archive (ord-61d7c948e79b47fd9fd72f241c80d4f1). Open the source and check it against what is on this page.

  • experimental reaction archive record ord-61d7c948e79b47fd9fd72f241c80d4f1 from dataset "750 AstraZeneca ELN dataset" (url: https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article-details/60c9e3f37792a23bfdb2d471). No atom mapping is provided by the source.

    experimental record · quality medium · source

experimental reaction record.

How to read this record

This is one experiment, not a rule. It says that on one occasion these species were combined under these conditions and this came out. It does not say the reaction will give the same result on your substrate, and nothing on the page has been generalised into a claim that it would.

The pathway is a separate question, kept on separate pages. A mechanism here is the canonical arrow pushing for a class, run on real structures and labelled rule-derived. It is not evidence, and this record is not a mechanism.