Skip to the content
Browse the library

Buchwald–Hartwig amination: 5-Chloro-7-(cyclopropylamino)pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine-3-carbonitrile → N-[5-[[3-cyano-7-(cyclopropylamino)pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidin-5-yl]amino]-4-fluoro-2-methylphenyl]acetamide

16% yield, run at 150 °C, as recorded by experimental reaction archive. The written procedure is below. One of 2 recorded runs making this product; all of them are compared below.

verified record, 16% yield recorded, Not balanced as written, From experimental reaction archive

Reagents, catalysts and solvents are in the table below.

The atoms, from reactants to products

CCONCCCNCCCNCCCNNCCCNCNCFCCCCl
Reactants · 1/6
breakingformingbond order changesmapped atom that changes

Drawn from the record's atom map: which bonds break and which form between the reactants and products the source listed. It shows a change in connectivity, not a simulated trajectory and not a mechanism.

What was in the flask

The equation does not balance as written. That is usual for an experimental record: the source listed what it put in and what it measured, not a stoichiometric equation.

Conditions

Temperature
150 °C

Only the dimensions the source stated are listed. Anything absent here was not recorded, and it is not inferred from what the class usually needs.

Yield

  • 16% of N-[5-[[3-cyano-7-(cyclopropylamino)pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidin-5-yl]amino]-4-fluoro-2-methylphenyl]acetamide.

Every recorded run making this product

2 runs of this class made the same product and differed in what else was in the flask. They are listed from the highest yield down, with this page's run marked.

CatalystReagentsSolventTemp.TimeYield
Di-tert-butyl(2',4',6'-tris(propan-2-yl)-(1,1'-biphenyl)-2-yl)phosphane; Bis(dibenzylideneacetone)palladiumCesium carbonate1,4-Dioxane150 °C—21%
1,1'-(9,9-Dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(1,1-diphenylphosphine); Bis(dibenzylideneacetone)palladiumCesium carbonateDimethylacetamide150 °C—16% (this run)

Every value is as the source recorded it. A run with no yield was reported without one, and nothing here is averaged, modelled or filled in.

Procedure

Copied from the source record, unedited

in microwave tube was 5-chloro-7-(cyclopropylamino)pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine-3-carbonitrile (80 mg, 0.34 mmol), N-(5-amino-4-fluoro-2-methylphenyl)acetamide (62.4 mg, 0.34 mmol), and (9,9-dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(diphenylphosphine) (19.81 mg, 0.03 mmol) in DMA (0.5 mL).Pd2(dba)3 (15.68 mg, 0.02 mmol) and cesium carbonate (223 mg, 0.68 mmol) were added. degassed, filled with N2.capped. then microwave 150C for 30 min. the organic solvent was removed. The black residue was tried to purifed by ISCO. impurity and prod came out together too quickly. concentrated to give offwhite solid. LCMS showed about 10% impurity. The solid was washed with hot EtOAc(1mL) to give about 21mg white solid. LCMS and NMR are OK, see attachment. low yield was due to hot EtOAc wash, lost some prod.

The source

This record comes from experimental reaction archive (ord-edbe9e3659f844c9af0347af857ae822). Open the source and check it against what is on this page.

  • experimental reaction archive record ord-edbe9e3659f844c9af0347af857ae822 from dataset "750 AstraZeneca ELN dataset" (url: https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article-details/60c9e3f37792a23bfdb2d471). No atom mapping is provided by the source.

    experimental record · quality medium · source

experimental reaction record.

How to read this record

This is one experiment, not a rule. It says that on one occasion these species were combined under these conditions and this came out. It does not say the reaction will give the same result on your substrate, and nothing on the page has been generalised into a claim that it would.

The pathway is a separate question, kept on separate pages. A mechanism here is the canonical arrow pushing for a class, run on real structures and labelled rule-derived. It is not evidence, and this record is not a mechanism.