Skip to the content
Browse the library

Buchwald–Hartwig amination: 1-(Benzyloxy)-4-bromo-2-fluorobenzene → (R)-4-(benzyloxy)-N-(2-(tert-butyldimethylsilyloxy)propyl)-3-fluoroaniline

65% yield, run at 120 °C, as recorded by experimental reaction archive. The written procedure is below. One of 2 recorded runs making this product; all of them are compared below.

verified record, 65% yield recorded, Not balanced as written, From experimental reaction archive

Reagents, catalysts and solvents are in the table below.

The atoms, from reactants to products

CCCNCCCCOCCCCCCCCFCOSiCCCCCCBr
Reactants · 1/6
breakingformingbond order changesmapped atom that changes

Drawn from the record's atom map: which bonds break and which form between the reactants and products the source listed. It shows a change in connectivity, not a simulated trajectory and not a mechanism.

What was in the flask

RoleSpeciesFormulaYield
Reactant1-(Benzyloxy)-4-bromo-2-fluorobenzeneC₁₃H₁₀BrFO—
Reactant(R)-2-(tert-butyldimethylsilyloxy)propan-1-amineC₉H₂₃NOSi—
ReagentCesium carbonateCCs₂O₃—
Catalyst2-Dicyclohexylphosphino-2',4',6'-triisoprophylbiphenylC₃₃H₄₉P—
CatalystPalladium (II) acetateC₄H₈O₄Pd—
SolventTolueneC₇H₈—
Product(R)-4-(benzyloxy)-N-(2-(tert-butyldimethylsilyloxy)propyl)-3-fluoroanilineC₂₂H₃₂FNO₂Si64.8%

The equation does not balance as written. That is usual for an experimental record: the source listed what it put in and what it measured, not a stoichiometric equation.

Conditions

Temperature
120 °C

Only the dimensions the source stated are listed. Anything absent here was not recorded, and it is not inferred from what the class usually needs.

Yield

  • 65% of (R)-4-(benzyloxy)-N-(2-(tert-butyldimethylsilyloxy)propyl)-3-fluoroaniline.

Every recorded run making this product

2 runs of this class made the same product and differed in what else was in the flask. They are listed from the highest yield down, with this page's run marked.

CatalystReagentsSolventTemp.TimeYield
2-Dicyclohexylphosphino-2',4',6'-triisoprophylbiphenyl; Palladium (II) acetateCesium carbonateToluene120 °C—65% (this run)
2-Dicyclohexylphosphino-2',4',6'-triisoprophylbiphenyl; Palladium (II) acetateCesium carbonate1,4-Dioxane120 °C—0%

Every value is as the source recorded it. A run with no yield was reported without one, and nothing here is averaged, modelled or filled in.

Procedure

Copied from the source record, unedited

PdOAc2 (0.799 g, 3.56 mmol) and dicyclohexyl(2',4',6'-triisopropylbiphenyl-2-yl)phosphine (1.696 g, 3.56 mmol) were added in one portion to a degassed solution of 1-(benzyloxy)-4-bromo-2-fluorobenzene (10.00 g, 35.57 mmol), (R)-2-(tert- butyldimethylsilyloxy)propan-1-amine (8.08 g, 42.69 mmol) and cesium carbonate (17.39 g, 53.36 mmol) in toluene (150 mL) at 120°C under nitrogen. The resulting suspension was stirred at 120 °C for 16 hours. The reaction was incomplete so the reaction mixture was stirred for a further 24 hours at 120°C. The reaction mixture was diluted with EtOAc (150 mL) and water (150 mL). The biphasic mixture was filtered through celite. The organic layer was separated and washed sequentially with water (150 mL) and saturated brine (150 mL). The organic layer was filtered

The source

This record comes from experimental reaction archive (ord-611f7690ba1449b3a297ce2aee3500c7). Open the source and check it against what is on this page.

  • experimental reaction archive record ord-611f7690ba1449b3a297ce2aee3500c7 from dataset "750 AstraZeneca ELN dataset" (url: https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article-details/60c9e3f37792a23bfdb2d471). No atom mapping is provided by the source.

    experimental record · quality medium · source

experimental reaction record.

How to read this record

This is one experiment, not a rule. It says that on one occasion these species were combined under these conditions and this came out. It does not say the reaction will give the same result on your substrate, and nothing on the page has been generalised into a claim that it would.

The pathway is a separate question, kept on separate pages. A mechanism here is the canonical arrow pushing for a class, run on real structures and labelled rule-derived. It is not evidence, and this record is not a mechanism.