Buchwald–Hartwig amination, record ord-2545e16c54de49a781f0868d26d7cb44
One recorded run of this reaction. Below is what the source recorded, and nothing added to it.
What was in the flask
| Role | Species | Formula | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reactant | N-(1,3-dimethylpyrazol-4-yl)-4-iodo-5-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-2-amine | C₁₁H₁₀F₃IN₄ | |
| Reactant | 2-amino-N,6-dimethoxybenzamide | C₉H₁₂N₂O₃ | |
| Reagent | Cesium carbonate | CCs₂O₃ | |
| Catalyst | 1,1'-(9,9-Dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(1,1-diphenylphosphine) | C₃₉H₃₂OP₂ | |
| Catalyst | Palladium (II) acetate | C₄H₈O₄Pd | |
| Solvent | 1,4-Dioxane | C₄H₈O₂ | |
| Product | 2-[[2-[(1,3-dimethylpyrazol-4-yl)amino]-5-(trifluoromethyl)-4-pyridyl]amino]-N,6-dimethoxy-benzamide | C₂₀H₂₁F₃N₆O₃ | 74.09% |
Conditions
- Temperature
- 90 °C
Yield
- 74% of 2-[[2-[(1,3-dimethylpyrazol-4-yl)amino]-5-(trifluoromethyl)-4-pyridyl]amino]-N,6-dimethoxy-benzamide.
Procedure
Copied from the source record, unedited
(9,9-dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(diphenylphosphine) (34.1 mg, 0.06 mmol), diacetoxypalladium (7.93 mg, 0.04 mmol), 2-amino-N,6-dimethoxybenzamide (131 mg, 0.67 mmol), N-(1,3-dimethyl-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-4-iodo-5-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-2-amine (150 mg, 0.39 mmol) and cesium carbonate (256 mg, 0.79 mmol) were weighed out in a µwave vial, sealed and dioxane (5 mL) was added. Argon was let to bubble in the mixture for 5 minutes. The reaction was stirred at 90 °C overnight. The reaction mixture was allowed to cool to room temperature, diluted with dichloromethane and MeOH, silica gel was added and the mixture was concentrated. The crude product was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel (25g) eluting with 0 to 5% methanol in ethyl acetate/DCM (1/1). The solvent was evaporated to dr
The source
This record comes from experimental reaction archive (ord-2545e16c54de49a781f0868d26d7cb44). Open the source and check it against what is on this page.
experimental reaction archive record ord-2545e16c54de49a781f0868d26d7cb44 from dataset "750 AstraZeneca ELN dataset" (url: https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article-details/60c9e3f37792a23bfdb2d471). No atom mapping is provided by the source.
How to read this record
This is one experiment, not a rule. It says that on one occasion these species were combined under these conditions and this came out. It does not say the reaction will give the same result on your substrate, and nothing on the page has been generalised into a claim that it would.
The pathway is a separate question, kept on separate pages. A mechanism here is the canonical arrow pushing for a class, run on real structures and labelled rule-derived. It is not evidence, and this record is not a mechanism.