Skip to the content
Browse the library

Buchwald–Hartwig amination: 2,4-Dichloropyridine → 4-chloro-N-(2-methylpyrazol-3-yl)pyridin-2-amine

10% yield, run at 200 °C, as recorded by experimental reaction archive. The written procedure is below.

verified record, 10% yield recorded, Not balanced as written, From experimental reaction archive

Reagents, catalysts and solvents are in the table below.

The atoms, from reactants to products

CNNCCCNCCCClCCNCl
Reactants · 1/6
breakingformingbond order changesmapped atom that changes

Drawn from the record's atom map: which bonds break and which form between the reactants and products the source listed. It shows a change in connectivity, not a simulated trajectory and not a mechanism.

What was in the flask

RoleSpeciesFormulaYield
Reactant2,4-DichloropyridineC₅H₃Cl₂N—
Reactant2-Methyl-2H-pyrazol-3-ylamineC₄H₇N₃—
ReagentCesium carbonateCCs₂O₃—
Catalyst1,1'-(9,9-Dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(1,1-diphenylphosphine)C₃₉H₃₂OP₂—
CatalystBis(dibenzylideneacetone)palladiumC₅₁H₄₂O₃Pd₂—
Solvent1,4-DioxaneC₄H₈O₂—
Product4-chloro-N-(2-methylpyrazol-3-yl)pyridin-2-amineC₉H₉ClN₄9.93%

The equation does not balance as written. That is usual for an experimental record: the source listed what it put in and what it measured, not a stoichiometric equation.

Conditions

Temperature
200 °C

Only the dimensions the source stated are listed. Anything absent here was not recorded, and it is not inferred from what the class usually needs.

Yield

  • 10% of 4-chloro-N-(2-methylpyrazol-3-yl)pyridin-2-amine.

Procedure

Copied from the source record, unedited

2,4-dichloropyridine (100mg, 0.68 mmol), 1-methyl-1H-pyrazol-5-amine (72.2 mg, 0.74 mmol) and cesium carbonate (330 mg, 1.01 mmol), (9,9-dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(diphenylphosphine) (46.1 mg, 0.08 mmol) and TRIS(DIBENZYLIDENEACETONE)DIPALLADIUM(0) (25.06 mg, 0.03 mmol) were suspended in 1,4-dioxane (5 mL) and sealed into a microwave tube. The reaction was heated to 200°C for 1 hour in the microwave reactor and cooled to RT. The reaction mixture was evaporated to dryness and redissolved in DCM (20 mL), and washed with water (20 mL). The organic layer was filtered with phase separating paper and evaporated to afford crude product. The crude product was purified by flash silica chromatography, elution gradient 0 to 3% MeOH in DCM. Pure fractions were evaporated to dryness to afford

The source

This record comes from experimental reaction archive (ord-1216a944f8b54fd3a989e124edb2145c). Open the source and check it against what is on this page.

  • experimental reaction archive record ord-1216a944f8b54fd3a989e124edb2145c from dataset "750 AstraZeneca ELN dataset" (url: https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article-details/60c9e3f37792a23bfdb2d471). No atom mapping is provided by the source.

    experimental record · quality medium · source

experimental reaction record.

How to read this record

This is one experiment, not a rule. It says that on one occasion these species were combined under these conditions and this came out. It does not say the reaction will give the same result on your substrate, and nothing on the page has been generalised into a claim that it would.

The pathway is a separate question, kept on separate pages. A mechanism here is the canonical arrow pushing for a class, run on real structures and labelled rule-derived. It is not evidence, and this record is not a mechanism.