Buchwald–Hartwig amination, record ord-1216a944f8b54fd3a989e124edb2145c
One recorded run of this reaction. Below is what the source recorded, and nothing added to it.
What was in the flask
| Role | Species | Formula | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reactant | 2,4-Dichloropyridine | C₅H₃Cl₂N | |
| Reactant | 2-Methyl-2H-pyrazol-3-ylamine | C₄H₇N₃ | |
| Reagent | Cesium carbonate | CCs₂O₃ | |
| Catalyst | 1,1'-(9,9-Dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(1,1-diphenylphosphine) | C₃₉H₃₂OP₂ | |
| Catalyst | Bis(dibenzylideneacetone)palladium | C₅₁H₄₂O₃Pd₂ | |
| Solvent | 1,4-Dioxane | C₄H₈O₂ | |
| Product | 4-chloro-N-(2-methylpyrazol-3-yl)pyridin-2-amine | C₉H₉ClN₄ | 9.93% |
Conditions
- Temperature
- 200 °C
Yield
- 10% of 4-chloro-N-(2-methylpyrazol-3-yl)pyridin-2-amine.
Procedure
Copied from the source record, unedited
2,4-dichloropyridine (100mg, 0.68 mmol), 1-methyl-1H-pyrazol-5-amine (72.2 mg, 0.74 mmol) and cesium carbonate (330 mg, 1.01 mmol), (9,9-dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(diphenylphosphine) (46.1 mg, 0.08 mmol) and TRIS(DIBENZYLIDENEACETONE)DIPALLADIUM(0) (25.06 mg, 0.03 mmol) were suspended in 1,4-dioxane (5 mL) and sealed into a microwave tube. The reaction was heated to 200°C for 1 hour in the microwave reactor and cooled to RT. The reaction mixture was evaporated to dryness and redissolved in DCM (20 mL), and washed with water (20 mL). The organic layer was filtered with phase separating paper and evaporated to afford crude product. The crude product was purified by flash silica chromatography, elution gradient 0 to 3% MeOH in DCM. Pure fractions were evaporated to dryness to afford
The source
This record comes from experimental reaction archive (ord-1216a944f8b54fd3a989e124edb2145c). Open the source and check it against what is on this page.
experimental reaction archive record ord-1216a944f8b54fd3a989e124edb2145c from dataset "750 AstraZeneca ELN dataset" (url: https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article-details/60c9e3f37792a23bfdb2d471). No atom mapping is provided by the source.
How to read this record
This is one experiment, not a rule. It says that on one occasion these species were combined under these conditions and this came out. It does not say the reaction will give the same result on your substrate, and nothing on the page has been generalised into a claim that it would.
The pathway is a separate question, kept on separate pages. A mechanism here is the canonical arrow pushing for a class, run on real structures and labelled rule-derived. It is not evidence, and this record is not a mechanism.