Skip to the content
Browse the library

Buchwald–Hartwig amination: N-(1,3-dimethylpyrazol-5-yl)-4-iodo-5-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-2-amine → 2-[[2-[(2,5-dimethylpyrazol-3-yl)amino]-5-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-4-yl]amino]-N,6-dimethoxybenzamide

72% yield, run at 90 °C, as recorded by experimental reaction archive. The written procedure is below. One of 3 recorded runs making this product; all of them are compared below.

verified record, 72% yield recorded, Not balanced as written, From experimental reaction archive

Reagents, catalysts and solvents are in the table below.

The atoms, from reactants to products

CONCOCCNCCCNCCCCNNCNCCCFFFCCCCOCI
Reactants · 1/6
breakingformingbond order changesmapped atom that changes

Drawn from the record's atom map: which bonds break and which form between the reactants and products the source listed. It shows a change in connectivity, not a simulated trajectory and not a mechanism.

What was in the flask

RoleSpeciesFormulaYield
ReactantN-(1,3-dimethylpyrazol-5-yl)-4-iodo-5-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-2-amineC₁₁H₁₀F₃IN₄—
Reactant2-amino-N,6-dimethoxybenzamideC₉H₁₂N₂O₃—
ReagentCesium carbonateCCs₂O₃—
Catalyst1,1'-(9,9-Dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(1,1-diphenylphosphine)C₃₉H₃₂OP₂—
CatalystPalladium (II) acetateC₄H₈O₄Pd—
Solvent1,4-DioxaneC₄H₈O₂—
Product2-[[2-[(2,5-dimethylpyrazol-3-yl)amino]-5-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-4-yl]amino]-N,6-dimethoxybenzamideC₂₀H₂₁F₃N₆O₃71.59%

The equation does not balance as written. That is usual for an experimental record: the source listed what it put in and what it measured, not a stoichiometric equation.

Conditions

Temperature
90 °C

Only the dimensions the source stated are listed. Anything absent here was not recorded, and it is not inferred from what the class usually needs.

Yield

  • 72% of 2-[[2-[(2,5-dimethylpyrazol-3-yl)amino]-5-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-4-yl]amino]-N,6-dimethoxybenzamide.

Every recorded run making this product

3 runs of this class made the same product and differed in what else was in the flask. They are listed from the highest yield down, with this page's run marked.

CatalystReagentsSolventTemp.TimeYield
1,1'-(9,9-Dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(1,1-diphenylphosphine); Palladium (II) acetateCesium carbonate1,4-Dioxane90 °C—72% (this run)
Binap, (A+-)-; Palladium (II) acetateCesium carbonate1,4-Dioxane90 °C—0%
1,1'-(9,9-Dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(1,1-diphenylphosphine); Palladium (II) acetatePotassium Carbonate1,4-Dioxane90 °C—0%

Every value is as the source recorded it. A run with no yield was reported without one, and nothing here is averaged, modelled or filled in.

Procedure

Copied from the source record, unedited

N-(1,3-dimethyl-1H-pyrazol-5-yl)-4-iodo-5-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-2-amine (22.8 g, 59.67 mmol), 2-amino-N,6-dimethoxybenzamide (19.90 g, 101.43 mmol), diacetoxypalladium (0.670 g, 2.98 mmol), (9,9-dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(diphenylphosphine) (3.45 g, 5.97 mmol) and cesium carbonate (23.33 g, 71.60 mmol) were suspended in 1,4-dioxane (199 ml). The reaction was degased, purged with nitrogen and heated to 90 °C => _reaction turned to dark brown and solidified after ~15 minutes._ 1,4-dioxane (50 mL) was added and reaction was stirred at 90°C (internal temperature) overnight => _stirring became easier and mixture turned to beige/yellow then to dark green/grey during the night._ Reaction was concentrated to dryness. Residue was diluted with CH2Cl2 (300 mL) and water (300 mL). Aqueous wa

The source

This record comes from experimental reaction archive (ord-a7be07888e18485384d8c572f896eab3). Open the source and check it against what is on this page.

  • experimental reaction archive record ord-a7be07888e18485384d8c572f896eab3 from dataset "750 AstraZeneca ELN dataset" (url: https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article-details/60c9e3f37792a23bfdb2d471). No atom mapping is provided by the source.

    experimental record · quality medium · source

experimental reaction record.

How to read this record

This is one experiment, not a rule. It says that on one occasion these species were combined under these conditions and this came out. It does not say the reaction will give the same result on your substrate, and nothing on the page has been generalised into a claim that it would.

The pathway is a separate question, kept on separate pages. A mechanism here is the canonical arrow pushing for a class, run on real structures and labelled rule-derived. It is not evidence, and this record is not a mechanism.