Skip to the content
Browse the library

Buchwald–Hartwig amination: 5-Chloro-7-(cyclopropylamino)pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine-3-carbonitrile → N-[5-[[3-cyano-7-(cyclopropylamino)pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidin-5-yl]amino]-2-[(3S)-3-(dimethylamino)pyrrolidin-1-yl]phenyl]acetamide

37% yield, run at 150 °C, as recorded by experimental reaction archive. The written procedure is below.

verified record, 37% yield recorded, Not balanced as written, From experimental reaction archive

Reagents, catalysts and solvents are in the table below.

The atoms, from reactants to products

CCONCCCNCCCNCCCNNCCCNCNCCCNCCCNCCCCl
Reactants · 1/6
breakingformingbond order changesmapped atom that changes

Drawn from the record's atom map: which bonds break and which form between the reactants and products the source listed. It shows a change in connectivity, not a simulated trajectory and not a mechanism.

What was in the flask

The equation does not balance as written. That is usual for an experimental record: the source listed what it put in and what it measured, not a stoichiometric equation.

Conditions

Temperature
150 °C

Only the dimensions the source stated are listed. Anything absent here was not recorded, and it is not inferred from what the class usually needs.

Yield

  • 37% of N-[5-[[3-cyano-7-(cyclopropylamino)pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidin-5-yl]amino]-2-[(3S)-3-(dimethylamino)pyrrolidin-1-yl]phenyl]acetamide.

Other recorded runs with the same starting material

Procedure

Copied from the source record, unedited

in microwave tube was 5-chloro-7-(cyclopropylamino)pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine-3-carbonitrile (100mg, 0.43 mmol), [Reactants], and (9,9-dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(diphenylphosphine) (24.76 mg, 0.04 mmol) in DMA (1.0 mL).Pd2(dba)3 (19.60 mg, 0.02 mmol) and cesium carbonate (279 mg, 0.86 mmol) were added. degassed, filled with N2.capped. then microwave 150C for 30 min. filtered, then concentrated. The crude material was purified by ISC(Hex to Hex:EtOAc=1;1 to EtOAc to EtOAc:MeOH=10:1 to EtOAc:MeOH:Et3N=10:1:0.1)) to give no very pure product. collect the product fraction, concentrated to dryness. no pure enough, tried to form solid. it failed sent to ananlytic group for purification. came back. it was OK 1TFA salt. NMR LCMS are OK

The source

This record comes from experimental reaction archive (ord-6ca842b2903f47c19f42752e7a96ea52). Open the source and check it against what is on this page.

  • experimental reaction archive record ord-6ca842b2903f47c19f42752e7a96ea52 from dataset "750 AstraZeneca ELN dataset" (url: https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article-details/60c9e3f37792a23bfdb2d471). No atom mapping is provided by the source.

    experimental record · quality medium · source

experimental reaction record.

How to read this record

This is one experiment, not a rule. It says that on one occasion these species were combined under these conditions and this came out. It does not say the reaction will give the same result on your substrate, and nothing on the page has been generalised into a claim that it would.

The pathway is a separate question, kept on separate pages. A mechanism here is the canonical arrow pushing for a class, run on real structures and labelled rule-derived. It is not evidence, and this record is not a mechanism.