Buchwald–Hartwig amination, record ord-4ba5714524f04061a19a2e24cddcf117
One recorded run of this reaction. Below is what the source recorded, and nothing added to it.
What was in the flask
| Role | Species | Formula | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reactant | 2,4-Dichloropyridine | C₅H₃Cl₂N | |
| Reactant | 2-Aminooxazole | C₃H₄N₂O | |
| Reagent | sodium 2-methylpropan-2-olate | C₄H₉NaO | |
| Catalyst | Binap, (A+-)- | C₄₄H₃₂P₂ | |
| Catalyst | Bis(dibenzylideneacetone)palladium | C₅₁H₄₂O₃Pd₂ | |
| Solvent | Toluene | C₇H₈ | |
| Product | N-(4-chloro-2-pyridinyl)-1,3-oxazol-2-amine | C₈H₆ClN₃O | 0% |
Conditions
- Temperature
- 100 °C
Yield
- 0% of N-(4-chloro-2-pyridinyl)-1,3-oxazol-2-amine.
Procedure
Copied from the source record, unedited
To a vial containing oxazol-2-amine (102 mg, 1.22 mmol), , TRIS(DIBENZYLIDENEACETONE)DIPALLADIUM(0) (9.28 mg, 10.14 µmol), 2,2'-bis(diphenylphosphino)-1,1'-binaphthyl (9.47 mg, 0.02 mmol) and sodium 2-methylpropan-2-olate (136 mg, 1.42 mmol), was added degassed toluene (4 mL) and 2,4-dichloropyridine (0.109 ml, 1.01 mmol) and the reaction mixture was heated to 100 degrees C for 20 h. None of the desired product was observed by LCMS or in crude proton NMR. **It is of note that although the 2,4-dichloropyridine is present in the crude proton NMR, the oxazole-2-amine is not**. It is possible that under the strongly basic reaction conditions that this starting material decomposed. Product not isolated.
The source
This record comes from experimental reaction archive (ord-4ba5714524f04061a19a2e24cddcf117). Open the source and check it against what is on this page.
experimental reaction archive record ord-4ba5714524f04061a19a2e24cddcf117 from dataset "750 AstraZeneca ELN dataset" (url: https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article-details/60c9e3f37792a23bfdb2d471). No atom mapping is provided by the source.
How to read this record
This is one experiment, not a rule. It says that on one occasion these species were combined under these conditions and this came out. It does not say the reaction will give the same result on your substrate, and nothing on the page has been generalised into a claim that it would.
The pathway is a separate question, kept on separate pages. A mechanism here is the canonical arrow pushing for a class, run on real structures and labelled rule-derived. It is not evidence, and this record is not a mechanism.