Skip to the content
Browse the library

Buchwald–Hartwig amination: (R)-2-chloro-6-methyl-8-phenyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydropyrimido[5,4-f][1,4]oxazepine → (R)-N-(3-methoxy-4-(4-methyl-1H-imidazol-1-yl)phenyl)-6-methyl-8-phenyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydropyrimido[5,4-f][1,4]oxazepin-2-amine

30% yield, run at 130 °C, as recorded by experimental reaction archive. The written procedure is below. One of 7 recorded runs making this product; all of them are compared below.

verified record, 30% yield recorded, Not balanced as written, From experimental reaction archive

Reagents, catalysts and solvents are in the table below.

The atoms, from reactants to products

COCCCNCNCCCNOCCCCCCCCNCCCCCNCNCCCCl
Reactants · 1/6
breakingformingbond order changesmapped atom that changes

Drawn from the record's atom map: which bonds break and which form between the reactants and products the source listed. It shows a change in connectivity, not a simulated trajectory and not a mechanism.

What was in the flask

The equation does not balance as written. That is usual for an experimental record: the source listed what it put in and what it measured, not a stoichiometric equation.

Conditions

Temperature
130 °C

Only the dimensions the source stated are listed. Anything absent here was not recorded, and it is not inferred from what the class usually needs.

Yield

  • 30% of (R)-N-(3-methoxy-4-(4-methyl-1H-imidazol-1-yl)phenyl)-6-methyl-8-phenyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydropyrimido[5,4-f][1,4]oxazepin-2-amine.

Every recorded run making this product

7 runs of this class made the same product and differed in what else was in the flask. They are listed from the highest yield down, with this page's run marked.

CatalystReagentsSolventTemp.TimeYield
1,1'-(9,9-Dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(1,1-diphenylphosphine); Palladium (II) acetateCesium carbonate1,4-Dioxane130 °C—30% (this run)
Tris(1,1-dimethylethyl)phosphine; Palladium (II) acetateCesium carbonate1,4-Dioxane120 °C—15%
2-(Dicyclohexylphosphino)biphenyl; Palladium (II) acetateCesium carbonate1,2-Dimethoxyethane100 °C—7%
Binap, (A+-)-; Palladium (II) acetatePotassium CarbonateToluene120 °C—0%
Tris(1,1-dimethylethyl)phosphine; Palladium (II) acetateSodium 2-methylbutan-2-olate1,4-Dioxane120 °C—0%
Binap, (A+-)-; Bis(dibenzylideneacetone)palladiumsodium 2-methylpropan-2-olateToluene120 °C—0%
1,1'-(9,9-Dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(1,1-diphenylphosphine); Bis(dibenzylideneacetone)palladiumCesium carbonate1,4-Dioxane130 °C—0%

Every value is as the source recorded it. A run with no yield was reported without one, and nothing here is averaged, modelled or filled in.

Procedure

Copied from the source record, unedited

(R)-2-chloro-6-methyl-8-phenyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydropyrimido[5,4-f][1,4]oxazepine (400 mg, 1.45 mmol), 3-methoxy-4-(4-methyl-1H-imidazol-1-yl)aniline (265 mg, 1.31 mmol), Cesium carbonate (709 mg, 2.18 mmol), Palladium(II) acetate (32.6 mg, 0.15 mmol) and 9,9-Dimethyl-4,5-bis(diphenylphosphino)xanthene (168 mg, 0.29 mmol) were added to a microwave vial then dioxane (18 mL) was added. The reaction mixture was flushed with argon and then heated at 140°C for 60 min in a MW. The reaction mixture was filtered through celite and concentrated. The crude product was purified by silica flash chromatography using a gradient of methanol (0 to 5%) in dichloromethane. Not pure enough. The product was purified further with preparative chromatography. The productcontainíng product was collected and the meth

The source

This record comes from experimental reaction archive (ord-8ae4472e49574adcac504920ccdd2d20). Open the source and check it against what is on this page.

  • experimental reaction archive record ord-8ae4472e49574adcac504920ccdd2d20 from dataset "750 AstraZeneca ELN dataset" (url: https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article-details/60c9e3f37792a23bfdb2d471). No atom mapping is provided by the source.

    experimental record · quality medium · source

experimental reaction record.

How to read this record

This is one experiment, not a rule. It says that on one occasion these species were combined under these conditions and this came out. It does not say the reaction will give the same result on your substrate, and nothing on the page has been generalised into a claim that it would.

The pathway is a separate question, kept on separate pages. A mechanism here is the canonical arrow pushing for a class, run on real structures and labelled rule-derived. It is not evidence, and this record is not a mechanism.