Skip to the content
Browse the library

Buchwald–Hartwig amination: 4-Bromo-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-1H-indazole → N-[(2S)-1-[[1-(4-fluorophenyl)indazol-4-yl]amino]-3-methylbutan-2-yl]-2,4,6-trimethylbenzenesulfonamide

11% yield, run at 110 °C, as recorded by experimental reaction archive. The written procedure is below.

verified record, 11% yield recorded, Not balanced as written, From experimental reaction archive

Reagents, catalysts and solvents are in the table below.

The atoms, from reactants to products

CCCCCCSOONCCNCCCCCCCNNCCCCFCCCCCCCCBr
Reactants · 1/6
breakingformingbond order changesmapped atom that changes

Drawn from the record's atom map: which bonds break and which form between the reactants and products the source listed. It shows a change in connectivity, not a simulated trajectory and not a mechanism.

What was in the flask

RoleSpeciesFormulaYield
Reactant4-Bromo-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-1H-indazoleC₁₃H₈BrFN₂—
ReactantCc1cc(C)c(S(=O)(=O)N[C@H](CN)C(C)C)c(C)c1C₁₄H₂₄N₂O₂S—
Reagentsodium 2-methylpropan-2-olateC₄H₉NaO—
CatalystBinap, (A+-)-C₄₄H₃₂P₂—
CatalystBis(dibenzylideneacetone)palladiumC₅₁H₄₂O₃Pd₂—
SolventTolueneC₇H₈—
ProductN-[(2S)-1-[[1-(4-fluorophenyl)indazol-4-yl]amino]-3-methylbutan-2-yl]-2,4,6-trimethylbenzenesulfonamideC₂₇H₃₁FN₄O₂S11.38%

The equation does not balance as written. That is usual for an experimental record: the source listed what it put in and what it measured, not a stoichiometric equation.

Conditions

Temperature
110 °C

Only the dimensions the source stated are listed. Anything absent here was not recorded, and it is not inferred from what the class usually needs.

Yield

  • 11% of N-[(2S)-1-[[1-(4-fluorophenyl)indazol-4-yl]amino]-3-methylbutan-2-yl]-2,4,6-trimethylbenzenesulfonamide.

Procedure

Copied from the source record, unedited

BINAP (0.432 g, 0.69 mmol) and Pd2(dba)3 (0.24 g, 0.26 mmol) were dissolved in toluene (10 mL) and to this (S)-N-(1-amino-3-methylbutan-2-yl)-2,4,6-trimethylbenzenesulfonamide (0.856 g, 3.01 mmol) and 4-bromo-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-1H-indazole (0.876 g, 3.01 mmol) was added followed by sodium tert-butoxide (0.434 g, 4.51 mmol). The reaction mixture was degassed and the reaction tube was filled with nitrogen before it was heated at 110°C for 2h. LCMS indicated 55% product and just a small amout of starting materials remained. The reaction was partitioned between EtOAc and water. The layers were separated and the aqueous extracted twice with EtOAc. The organic extracts were combined, filtered through a fine sinter funnel to remove a grey ppte and then dried using a phase separator cartridge. The

The source

This record comes from experimental reaction archive (ord-91d62f2c93df477a8b3df11f707f23e4). Open the source and check it against what is on this page.

  • experimental reaction archive record ord-91d62f2c93df477a8b3df11f707f23e4 from dataset "750 AstraZeneca ELN dataset" (url: https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article-details/60c9e3f37792a23bfdb2d471). No atom mapping is provided by the source.

    experimental record · quality medium · source

experimental reaction record.

How to read this record

This is one experiment, not a rule. It says that on one occasion these species were combined under these conditions and this came out. It does not say the reaction will give the same result on your substrate, and nothing on the page has been generalised into a claim that it would.

The pathway is a separate question, kept on separate pages. A mechanism here is the canonical arrow pushing for a class, run on real structures and labelled rule-derived. It is not evidence, and this record is not a mechanism.