Buchwald–Hartwig amination, record ord-221a1c88a71944db90ec733265031251
One recorded run of this reaction. Below is what the source recorded, and nothing added to it.
What was in the flask
| Role | Species | Formula | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reactant | (2R)-8-chloro-4-methyl-2-phenyl-3,5-dihydro-2H-pyrido[3,2-f][1,4]oxazepine | C₁₅H₁₅ClN₂O | |
| Reactant | 4-(3-Methyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)aniline | C₉H₁₀N₄ | |
| Reagent | Cesium carbonate | CCs₂O₃ | |
| Catalyst | 1,1'-(9,9-Dimethyl-9H-xanthene-4,5-diyl)bis(1,1-diphenylphosphine) | C₃₉H₃₂OP₂ | |
| Catalyst | Palladium (II) acetate | C₄H₈O₄Pd | |
| Solvent | 1,2-Dimethoxyethane | C₄H₁₀O₂ | |
| Product | (R)-4-Methyl-N-(4-(3-methyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)phenyl)-2-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydropyrido[3,2-f][1,4]oxazepin-8-amine | C₂₄H₂₄N₆O | 0% |
Conditions
- Temperature
- 100 °C
Yield
- 0% of (R)-4-Methyl-N-(4-(3-methyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)phenyl)-2-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydropyrido[3,2-f][1,4]oxazepin-8-amine.
Procedure
Copied from the source record, unedited
A solution of (R)-8-chloro-4-methyl-2-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydropyrido[3,2-f][1,4]oxazepine (5.00 mg, 0.02 mmol) and 4-(3-methyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)aniline (3.17 mg, 0.02 mmol) in DME (.5 mL) was added via a syringe to a capped microwave vial containing PALLADIUM(II) ACETATE (0.409 mg, 1.82 µmol), XANTPHOS (1.053 mg, 1.82 µmol) and CESIUM CARBONATE (8.89 mg, 0.03 mmol) under an argon atmosphere. The resulting mixture was heated to 100°C in a microwavwe apparatus for 1 h and analyzed by LCMS. No product.
The source
This record comes from experimental reaction archive (ord-221a1c88a71944db90ec733265031251). Open the source and check it against what is on this page.
experimental reaction archive record ord-221a1c88a71944db90ec733265031251 from dataset "750 AstraZeneca ELN dataset" (url: https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article-details/60c9e3f37792a23bfdb2d471). No atom mapping is provided by the source.
How to read this record
This is one experiment, not a rule. It says that on one occasion these species were combined under these conditions and this came out. It does not say the reaction will give the same result on your substrate, and nothing on the page has been generalised into a claim that it would.
The pathway is a separate question, kept on separate pages. A mechanism here is the canonical arrow pushing for a class, run on real structures and labelled rule-derived. It is not evidence, and this record is not a mechanism.